FDEGX vs. VOT

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

FDEGX (Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund) and VOT (Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FDEGX returned 11.34%/yr vs 11.44%/yr for VOT. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FDEGX charges 0.63%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VOT.

Performance

FDEGX vs. VOT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FDEGX having a 5.33% return and VOT slightly higher at 5.36%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDEGX having a 11.34% annualized return and VOT not far ahead at 11.44%.

FDEGX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -7.51%
• 6M: -0.12%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 1Y: -5.12%
• 3Y*: 11.99%
• 5Y*: 6.04%
• 10Y*: 11.34%
• ALL TIME*: 9.48%

VOT

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -4.14%
• 6M: 3.07%
• YTD: 5.36%
• 1Y: 2.10%
• 3Y*: 12.33%
• 5Y*: 5.01%
• 10Y*: 11.44%
• ALL TIME*: 9.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDEGX vs. VOT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	5.33%	2.88%	26.57%	20.93%	-26.50%	21.30%	29.34%	36.59%	-6.92%	21.03%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	5.36%	10.72%	16.38%	23.10%	-28.87%	20.50%	34.50%	33.76%	-5.56%	21.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FDEGX and VOT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2006	0.95

The correlation between FDEGX and VOT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FDEGX vs. VOT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDEGX

FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 2
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

VOT

VOT Risk / Return Rank: 12
VOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 12
VOT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDEGX vs. VOT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FDEGX	VOT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	0.12	-0.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.12	0.29	-0.41
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	1.03	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	0.13	-0.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.57	0.39	-0.96

FDEGX vs. VOT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDEGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.20, which is lower than the VOT Sharpe Ratio of 0.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDEGX and VOT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FDEGX vs. VOT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDEGX drawdown since its inception was -85.96%, which is greater than VOT's maximum drawdown of -60.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDEGX and VOT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDEGX	VOT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-85.96%	-60.16%	-25.80%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.45%	-15.96%	-4.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.04%	-21.77%	-4.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-36.62%	-37.19%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.62%	-37.19%	+0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.66%	-4.30%	-5.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.71%	-9.91%	-26.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.20%	5.38%	+2.82%

Volatility

FDEGX vs. VOT - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a higher volatility of 6.72% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF (VOT) at 4.78%. This indicates that FDEGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FDEGX	VOT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.72%	4.78%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.71%	13.92%	+3.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.41%	17.07%	+6.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.62%	21.55%	+2.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.16%	21.02%	+1.14%

FDEGX vs. VOT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDEGX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than VOT's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDEGX vs. VOT - Dividend Comparison

FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund	0.00%	0.00%	7.89%	0.05%	0.00%	14.15%	8.37%	3.65%	0.75%	0.05%	0.59%	0.13%
VOT Vanguard Mid-Cap Growth ETF	0.62%	0.64%	0.67%	0.71%	0.78%	0.34%	0.56%	0.78%	0.84%	0.72%	0.81%	0.81%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDEGX and VOT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FDEGX and VOT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FDEGX or VOT?

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.72%) compared to VOT (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDEGX dropped -85.96% vs VOT's -60.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.12 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.