PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDD vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDD vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FDD having a 18.92% return and FDL slightly lower at 18.16%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDD having a 11.01% annualized return and FDL not far ahead at 11.09%.


FDD

1D
0.50%
1M
7.25%
6M
13.35%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
39.43%
3Y*
27.25%
5Y*
13.14%
10Y*
11.01%
ALL TIME*
2.89%

FDL

1D
0.02%
1M
3.27%
6M
9.50%
YTD
18.16%
1Y
27.65%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.98%
10Y*
11.09%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$2.43M$2.30M$2.53M
$52.24M$50.06M$42.95M

FDD vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
18.92%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
18.16%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-4.30%24.41%-5.99%12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FDD and FDL is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.52

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between FDD and FDL has dropped to 0.25 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FDD vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDD
FDL

Financial Services

58.2%
13.7%

Industrials

11.4%
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
4.4%

Energy

9.1%
11.1%

Utilities

6.0%
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
24.3%

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

2.8%
0.4%

Communication Services

1.9%
11.2%

Healthcare

-

11.7%

Technology

-

4.3%

Financial Services

FDD
58.2%
FDL
13.7%

Industrials

FDD
11.4%
FDL
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FDD
9.2%
FDL
4.4%

Energy

FDD
9.1%
FDL
11.1%

Utilities

FDD
6.0%
FDL
15.4%

Consumer Defensive

FDD
4.2%
FDL
24.3%

Real Estate

FDD
3.3%
FDL

-

Basic Materials

FDD
2.8%
FDL
0.4%

Communication Services

FDD
1.9%
FDL
11.2%

Healthcare

FDD

-

FDL
11.7%

Technology

FDD

-

FDL
4.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDD vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FDD vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FDDFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.39

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

6.29

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

14.86

-1.09

FDD vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDD and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FDD vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than FDL's maximum drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDDFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.77%

-65.93%

-8.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-4.27%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.90%

-12.24%

-0.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.84%

-16.46%

-18.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-41.40%

-0.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.96%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.18%

-9.59%

-25.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

1.81%

+1.02%

Volatility

FDD vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) is 3.74%, while First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) has a volatility of 4.96%. This indicates that FDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDDFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

4.96%

-1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.14%

8.97%

+4.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.79%

11.95%

+3.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.44%

14.44%

+4.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.77%

17.16%

+2.61%

FDD vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDD vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than FDL's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
5.01%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.59%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDD and FDL have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDL has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FDD (3.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 10-year performance, FDL leads with 11.09% vs 11.01% for FDD. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 3.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FDL has performed better with a 11.09% return vs 11.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 3.59% for FDL.

FDD is categorized as Europe Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.43% for FDL.

FDD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDD and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer