PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDD vs. EFNL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDD vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDD achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.03% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FDD having a 9.96% annualized return and EFNL not far ahead at 10.07%.


FDD

1D
-1.17%
1M
3.51%
YTD
11.53%
6M
17.78%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
25.85%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
9.96%

EFNL

1D
-0.44%
1M
6.63%
YTD
21.03%
6M
25.68%
1Y
48.56%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
6.67%
10Y*
10.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDD vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
11.53%62.50%0.28%14.16%-16.14%16.03%-3.80%23.79%-8.98%19.07%
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
21.03%53.59%-5.28%-0.12%-17.29%10.50%20.19%13.64%-6.86%23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FDD and EFNL is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012

0.74

The correlation between FDD and EFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FDD vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FDD
EFNL

Financial Services

52.2%
26.0%

Industrials

12.5%
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
6.6%

Energy

10.8%
5.2%

Utilities

6.0%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
2.9%

Real Estate

3.5%
0.7%

Basic Materials

2.9%
6.3%

Communication Services

2.1%
2.6%

Healthcare

-

3.5%

Technology

-

21.4%

Financial Services

FDD
52.2%
EFNL
26.0%

Industrials

FDD
12.5%
EFNL
20.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FDD
12.3%
EFNL
6.6%

Energy

FDD
10.8%
EFNL
5.2%

Utilities

FDD
6.0%
EFNL
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

FDD
3.7%
EFNL
2.9%

Real Estate

FDD
3.5%
EFNL
0.7%

Basic Materials

FDD
2.9%
EFNL
6.3%

Communication Services

FDD
2.1%
EFNL
2.6%

Healthcare

FDD

-

EFNL
3.5%

Technology

FDD

-

EFNL
21.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDD vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDD
FDD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FDD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDD Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
FDD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

EFNL
EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDD vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDDEFNLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.16

2.83

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.98

3.69

-0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.47

-0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

6.16

-2.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.86

21.80

-9.94

FDD vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FDD Sharpe Ratio is 2.16, which is comparable to the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FDD and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDDEFNLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.16

2.83

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.34

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.50

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.47

-0.37

Drawdowns

FDD vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDD drawdown since its inception was -74.77%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDD and EFNL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDDEFNLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.77%

-38.70%

-36.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

-7.92%

-1.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.06%

-18.19%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

-38.70%

+3.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.43%

-38.70%

-2.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.26%

-0.44%

-1.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.47%

-10.93%

-24.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

2.23%

+0.56%

Volatility

FDD vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund (FDD) is 5.22%, while iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that FDD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDDEFNLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.22%

6.77%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.35%

13.87%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.43%

17.28%

-1.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.39%

19.60%

-1.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.16%

20.09%

+0.07%

FDD vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDD has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDD vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

FDD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than EFNL's 2.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EFNL
iShares MSCI Finland ETF
2.81%3.40%5.05%4.31%5.94%2.29%2.94%5.70%3.83%3.30%2.40%1.57%
FDD
First Trust STOXX European Select Dividend Index Fund
3.55%3.99%7.65%6.85%6.07%3.44%4.01%4.69%5.05%2.78%4.88%4.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDD and EFNL have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EFNL has higher volatility (6.77%) compared to FDD (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FDD dropped -74.77% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

On 10-year performance, EFNL leads with 10.07% vs 9.96% for FDD. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, FDD has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EFNL has performed better with a 10.07% return vs 9.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for FDD.

FDD has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 2.81% for EFNL.

FDD tracks STOXX Europe Select Dividend 30, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for FDD and 0.53% for EFNL.

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDD and EFNL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer