FDAT vs. THRV
FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
FDAT vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.
FDAT
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.24%
- YTD
- 3.20%
- 6M
- 3.66%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 9.02%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRV
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 1.66%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDAT vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 3.20% | -0.05% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.86% | 0.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between FDAT and THRV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FDAT vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
FDAT
THRV
FDAT vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FDAT | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FDAT | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 1.04 | -0.13 |
Drawdowns
FDAT vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FDAT | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.20% | -1.50% | -6.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.20% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -0.51% | -1.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.25% | -0.44% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | — | — |
Volatility
FDAT vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FDAT | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.31% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.91% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.89% | 2.92% | +6.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 2.92% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.47% | 2.92% | +6.55% |
FDAT vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FDAT vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than THRV's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF | 5.64% | 4.77% | 8.99% | 1.58% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.71% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FDAT and THRV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDAT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDAT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 4.71% for THRV.
They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for FDAT and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer