PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FDAT vs. THRV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FDAT vs. THRV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 1.86% return.


FDAT

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.24%
YTD
3.20%
6M
3.66%
1Y
11.57%
3Y*
9.02%
5Y*
10Y*

THRV

1D
-0.38%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.86%
6M
1.66%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FDAT
Tactical Advantage ETF
3.20%-0.05%
THRV
Prospera Income ETF
1.86%0.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAT and THRV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.60

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FDAT vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT
FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

THRV
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FDATTHRVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

FDAT vs. THRV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FDATTHRVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

1.04

-0.13

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and THRV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FDATTHRVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-1.50%

-6.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-0.51%

-1.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-0.44%

-1.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

Volatility

FDAT vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FDATTHRVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.89%

2.92%

+6.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.47%

2.92%

+6.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.47%

2.92%

+6.55%

FDAT vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

FDAT vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than THRV's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FDAT
Tactical Advantage ETF
5.64%4.77%8.99%1.58%
THRV
Prospera Income ETF
4.71%1.67%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FDAT and THRV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDAT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDAT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 4.71% for THRV.

They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Prospera Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 1.80% for THRV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FDAT and THRV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer