THRV vs. GAL
THRV (Prospera Income ETF) and GAL (SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THRV charges 1.80%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for GAL.
Performance
THRV vs. GAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRV achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly lower than GAL's 8.73% return.
THRV
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GAL
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 8.73%
- 6M
- 8.55%
- 1Y
- 19.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- 8.42%
THRV vs. GAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 1.79% | 0.15% |
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 8.73% | 2.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRV and GAL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.71 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRV vs. GAL — Risk / Return Rank
THRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GAL
THRV vs. GAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF (GAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| THRV | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.40 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.17 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 13.17 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
THRV vs. GAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRV drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum GAL drawdown of -28.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRV and GAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRV | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -28.31% | +26.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.27% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.56% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -3.73% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.50% | — |
Volatility
THRV vs. GAL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRV | GAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.40% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.55% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96% | 9.21% | -6.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 10.50% | -7.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.96% | 11.41% | -8.45% |
THRV vs. GAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
THRV has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than GAL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
THRV vs. GAL - Dividend Comparison
THRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than GAL's 3.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GAL SPDR SSgA Global Allocation ETF | 3.12% | 3.47% | 2.99% | 2.56% | 6.19% | 4.05% | 2.14% | 2.96% | 2.43% | 2.26% | 2.43% | 3.10% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 5.40% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THRV and GAL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GAL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GAL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 5.40%, compared with 3.12% for GAL.
They also come from different issuers: Prospera Funds and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.80% for THRV and 0.35% for GAL.
Find the right allocation for THRV and GAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer