THRV vs. NDAA
THRV (Prospera Income ETF) and NDAA (Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. THRV charges 1.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for NDAA.
Performance
THRV vs. NDAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, THRV achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than NDAA's 11.63% return.
THRV
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 2.25%
- 6M
- 2.17%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NDAA
- 1D
- 0.32%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 11.63%
- 6M
- 12.57%
- 1Y
- 26.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
THRV vs. NDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.25% | 0.16% |
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF | 11.63% | 2.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between THRV and NDAA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
THRV vs. NDAA — Risk / Return Rank
THRV
NDAA
THRV vs. NDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| THRV | NDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.54 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.28 | -0.02 |
Drawdowns
THRV vs. NDAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum THRV drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum NDAA drawdown of -13.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRV and NDAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| THRV | NDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.50% | -13.50% | +12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.62% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.13% | 0.00% | -0.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -1.95% | +1.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.77% | — |
Volatility
THRV vs. NDAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| THRV | NDAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.77% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.89% | 10.67% | -7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 11.95% | -9.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.89% | 11.95% | -9.06% |
THRV vs. NDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
THRV has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NDAA's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
THRV vs. NDAA - Dividend Comparison
THRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than NDAA's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
NDAA Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF | 2.42% | 2.71% | 0.83% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 4.69% | 1.67% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
THRV and NDAA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NDAA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NDAA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.
THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.42% for NDAA.
They also come from different issuers: Prospera Funds and Ned Davis Research. Their fees differ too: 1.80% for THRV and 0.65% for NDAA.
Find the right allocation for THRV and NDAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer