PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THRV vs. NDAA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THRV vs. NDAA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THRV achieves a 2.25% return, which is significantly lower than NDAA's 11.63% return.


THRV

1D
0.07%
1M
0.43%
YTD
2.25%
6M
2.17%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NDAA

1D
0.32%
1M
3.44%
YTD
11.63%
6M
12.57%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THRV vs. NDAA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
THRV
Prospera Income ETF
2.25%0.16%
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
11.63%2.94%

Correlation

The correlation between THRV and NDAA is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THRV vs. NDAA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THRV

NDAA
NDAA Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
NDAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NDAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NDAA Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
NDAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
NDAA Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THRV vs. NDAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prospera Income ETF (THRV) and Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF (NDAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

THRV vs. NDAA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


THRVNDAADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.28

-0.02

Drawdowns

THRV vs. NDAA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THRV drawdown since its inception was -1.50%, smaller than the maximum NDAA drawdown of -13.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THRV and NDAA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THRVNDAADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.50%

-13.50%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.13%

0.00%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-1.95%

+1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

Volatility

THRV vs. NDAA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THRVNDAADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.89%

10.67%

-7.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.89%

11.95%

-9.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.89%

11.95%

-9.06%

THRV vs. NDAA - Expense Ratio Comparison

THRV has a 1.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NDAA's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

THRV vs. NDAA - Dividend Comparison

THRV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.69%, more than NDAA's 2.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
NDAA
Ned Davis Research 360 Dynamic Allocation ETF
2.42%2.71%0.83%
THRV
Prospera Income ETF
4.69%1.67%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THRV and NDAA have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NDAA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NDAA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.80% for THRV.

THRV has the higher dividend yield at 4.69%, compared with 2.42% for NDAA.

They also come from different issuers: Prospera Funds and Ned Davis Research. Their fees differ too: 1.80% for THRV and 0.65% for NDAA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THRV and NDAA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer