FDAT vs. CTAP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FDAT (Tactical Advantage ETF) and CTAP (Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FDAT charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for CTAP.

Performance

FDAT vs. CTAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FDAT achieves a 3.20% return, which is significantly lower than CTAP's 21.95% return.

FDAT

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 1.24%
• YTD: 3.20%
• 6M: 3.66%
• 1Y: 11.57%
• 3Y*: 9.02%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CTAP

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: -3.24%
• YTD: 21.95%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FDAT vs. CTAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	3.20%	0.31%
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	21.95%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FDAT and CTAP is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2025	0.27

FDAT vs. CTAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FDAT	CTAP
Financial Services	22.5%	49.3%
Industrials	21.8%	-
Technology	14.9%	-
Basic Materials	9.2%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	-
Energy	7.8%	-
Real Estate	5.4%	-
Healthcare	3.2%	-
Utilities	2.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.2%	-
Communication Services	1.7%	-

Return for Risk

FDAT vs. CTAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FDAT

FDAT Risk / Return Rank: 35
FDAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
FDAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FDAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FDAT Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FDAT vs. CTAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tactical Advantage ETF (FDAT) and Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FDAT	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.97	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.59	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FDAT	CTAP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.18	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	2.50	-1.58

Drawdowns

FDAT vs. CTAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FDAT drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, smaller than the maximum CTAP drawdown of -9.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FDAT and CTAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	FDAT	CTAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.20%	-9.02%	+0.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.20%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.27%	-4.47%	+2.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.25%	-2.18%	-0.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FDAT	CTAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.31%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.91%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.89%	23.94%	-14.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.47%	23.94%	-14.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.47%	23.94%	-14.47%

FDAT vs. CTAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FDAT has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than CTAP's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FDAT vs. CTAP - Dividend Comparison

FDAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than CTAP's 0.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CTAP Simplify US Equity PLUS Managed Futures Strategy ETF	0.65%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FDAT Tactical Advantage ETF	5.64%	4.77%	8.99%	1.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FDAT and CTAP in my portfolio?

FDAT and CTAP have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FDAT or CTAP?

On fees, CTAP is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FDAT or CTAP?

CTAP is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for FDAT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FDAT or CTAP?

FDAT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.65% for CTAP.

What is the main difference between FDAT and CTAP?

They also come from different issuers: Tactical Funds and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for FDAT and 0.10% for CTAP.