PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 4.84% return.


FCVT

1D
-2.29%
1M
2.99%
YTD
24.74%
6M
22.65%
1Y
43.93%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
12.06%

KNG

1D
0.65%
1M
2.07%
YTD
4.84%
6M
4.41%
1Y
10.46%
3Y*
7.42%
5Y*
5.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
24.74%19.60%11.92%7.12%-20.88%4.23%51.02%22.30%-5.99%
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
4.84%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-1.56%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and KNG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between FCVT and KNG has dropped to 0.21 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVTKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.18

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

1.22

+3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.41

3.07

+15.34

FCVT vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-35.12%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.61%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

-14.24%

-0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

-18.20%

-12.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-3.46%

+1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-4.13%

-6.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

3.42%

-1.03%

Volatility

FCVT vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 3.00%. This indicates that FCVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

3.00%

+4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

7.59%

+6.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

10.41%

+6.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

13.58%

+0.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

17.15%

-2.16%

FCVT vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than KNG's 8.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.20%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%
KNG
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.45%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCVT and KNG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCVT has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to KNG (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FCVT leads with 6.75% vs 5.39% for KNG. On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCVT has performed better with a 6.75% return vs 5.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.45%, compared with 1.20% for FCVT.

FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.75% for KNG.

FCVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer