FCVT vs. CVRT
FCVT (First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF) and CVRT (Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCVT is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by First Trust, while CVRT is a Convertible Bonds fund actively managed by Calamos. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FCVT returned 47.07% vs 76.22% for CVRT. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCVT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CVRT.
Performance
FCVT vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 25.61% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 40.89% return.
FCVT
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 7.08%
- YTD
- 25.61%
- 6M
- 25.00%
- 1Y
- 47.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 12.36%
CVRT
- 1D
- -1.21%
- 1M
- 8.71%
- YTD
- 40.89%
- 6M
- 41.79%
- 1Y
- 76.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FCVT vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 25.61% | 19.60% | 11.92% | 10.14% |
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 40.89% | 29.37% | 13.23% | 11.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCVT and CVRT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2023 | 0.88 |
The correlation between FCVT and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCVT vs. CVRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCVT
CVRT
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
FCVT
CVRT
Consumer Cyclical
FCVT
CVRT
Financial Services
FCVT
CVRT
Healthcare
FCVT
CVRT
Basic Materials
FCVT
-
CVRT
Communication Services
FCVT
-
CVRT
Consumer Defensive
FCVT
-
CVRT
Energy
FCVT
-
CVRT
Industrials
FCVT
-
CVRT
Real Estate
FCVT
-
CVRT
Technology
FCVT
-
CVRT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCVT vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank
FCVT
CVRT
FCVT vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCVT | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.97 | 3.57 | -0.60 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.76 | 4.32 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.59 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.58 | 8.91 | -3.33 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.90 | 34.91 | -14.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCVT | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.97 | 3.57 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 1.84 | -1.16 |
Drawdowns
FCVT vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than CVRT's maximum drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and CVRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCVT | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.79% | -20.71% | -11.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.47% | -8.60% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.20% | -1.21% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.36% | -3.06% | -7.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 2.19% | +0.07% |
Volatility
FCVT vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) is 6.07%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 7.64%. This indicates that FCVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCVT | CVRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 7.64% | -1.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 17.57% | -4.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.94% | 21.47% | -5.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.09% | 19.96% | -5.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.85% | 19.96% | -5.11% |
FCVT vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
FCVT vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison
FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%, less than CVRT's 1.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CVRT Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF | 1.43% | 1.68% | 1.49% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FCVT First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF | 1.19% | 1.98% | 1.30% | 1.76% | 3.71% | 23.07% | 1.72% | 1.60% | 1.85% | 2.18% | 1.88% | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, FCVT and CVRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
CVRT has higher volatility (7.64%) compared to FCVT (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs CVRT's -20.71%.
On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 76.22% vs 47.07% for FCVT. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 6.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 76.22% return vs 47.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.
CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 1.19% for FCVT.
FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.69% for CVRT.
CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.57 vs 2.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCVT and CVRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer