PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCVT vs. CVRT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCVT vs. CVRT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCVT achieves a 24.74% return, which is significantly lower than CVRT's 36.17% return.


FCVT

1D
-2.29%
1M
2.99%
YTD
24.74%
6M
22.65%
1Y
43.93%
3Y*
20.64%
5Y*
6.75%
10Y*
12.06%

CVRT

1D
-2.11%
1M
1.39%
YTD
36.17%
6M
33.46%
1Y
69.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCVT vs. CVRT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
24.74%19.60%11.92%10.02%
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
36.17%29.37%13.23%11.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FCVT and CVRT is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2023

0.88

The correlation between FCVT and CVRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCVT vs. CVRT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCVT
FCVT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FCVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCVT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FCVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCVT Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

CVRT
CVRT Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CVRT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CVRT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CVRT Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CVRT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CVRT Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCVT vs. CVRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) and Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCVTCVRTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.52

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.21

8.17

-2.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.41

28.56

-10.16

FCVT vs. CVRT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCVT Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the CVRT Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCVT and CVRT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCVT vs. CVRT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCVT drawdown since its inception was -31.79%, which is greater than CVRT's maximum drawdown of -20.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCVT and CVRT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCVTCVRTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.79%

-20.71%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.47%

-8.60%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.29%

-4.51%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.32%

-3.09%

-7.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.39%

2.45%

-0.06%

Volatility

FCVT vs. CVRT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF (FCVT) is 7.27%, while Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF (CVRT) has a volatility of 8.61%. This indicates that FCVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CVRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCVTCVRTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.27%

8.61%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.25%

18.81%

-4.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.19%

22.67%

-5.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.37%

20.28%

-5.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.99%

20.28%

-5.29%

FCVT vs. CVRT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCVT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than CVRT's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCVT vs. CVRT - Dividend Comparison

FCVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, less than CVRT's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CVRT
Calamos Convertible Equity Alternative ETF
1.47%1.68%1.49%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FCVT
First Trust SSI Strategic Convertible Securities ETF
1.20%1.98%1.30%1.76%3.71%23.07%1.72%1.60%1.85%2.18%1.88%0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FCVT and CVRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CVRT has higher volatility (8.61%) compared to FCVT (7.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCVT dropped -31.79% vs CVRT's -20.71%.

On 1-year performance, CVRT leads with 69.90% vs 43.93% for FCVT. On fees, CVRT is cheaper at 0.69% per year. On volatility, FCVT has been the lower-risk option at 7.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, CVRT has performed better with a 69.90% return vs 43.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CVRT is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FCVT.

CVRT has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.20% for FCVT.

FCVT is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while CVRT is Convertible Bonds. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for FCVT and 0.69% for CVRT.

CVRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs 2.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCVT and CVRT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer