FCTR vs. RPG

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

FCTR (First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) and RPG (Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - FCTR tracks the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index while RPG tracks the S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCTR returned 3.73%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for RPG. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCTR charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for RPG.

Performance

FCTR vs. RPG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly lower than RPG's 30.55% return.

FCTR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: 12.71%
• 6M: 10.54%
• 1Y: 20.02%
• 3Y*: 17.59%
• 5Y*: 3.73%
• 10Y*: —

RPG

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 5.68%
• YTD: 30.55%
• 6M: 27.48%
• 1Y: 36.38%
• 3Y*: 27.80%
• 5Y*: 11.61%
• 10Y*: 15.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. RPG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	12.71%	8.63%	19.54%	0.71%	-20.42%	21.13%	30.17%	30.91%	-12.50%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	30.55%	13.41%	28.23%	8.04%	-27.55%	29.40%	29.34%	28.34%	-16.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and RPG is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018	0.85

The correlation between FCTR and RPG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. RPG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FCTR	RPG
Technology	36.5%	46.9%
Industrials	18.5%	14.0%
Financial Services	8.5%	5.3%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	14.7%
Healthcare	6.7%	6.4%
Basic Materials	5.7%	1.2%
Energy	4.7%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	4.3%	1.1%
Communication Services	2.9%	5.4%
Utilities	2.7%	2.4%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.0%

Return for Risk

FCTR vs. RPG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR

FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 36
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 32
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 44

RPG

RPG Risk / Return Rank: 61
RPG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
RPG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RPG Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RPG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. RPG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCTR	RPG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.10	1.66	-0.56
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	2.26	-0.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.30	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	3.30	-1.50
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.47	12.38	-5.91

FCTR vs. RPG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the RPG Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and RPG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. RPG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum RPG drawdown of -53.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and RPG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCTR	RPG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.10%	-53.27%	+16.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.17%	-11.08%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.63%	-24.75%	+2.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.10%	-35.59%	-1.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.58%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.88%	-4.43%	+1.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.34%	-8.83%	-1.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	2.95%	+0.15%

Volatility

FCTR vs. RPG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is 6.86%, while Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF (RPG) has a volatility of 11.10%. This indicates that FCTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCTR	RPG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	11.10%	-4.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.51%	18.98%	-6.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.30%	22.06%	-3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	23.86%	-4.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.96%	22.89%	-0.93%

FCTR vs. RPG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RPG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCTR vs. RPG - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, more than RPG's 0.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF	0.36%	0.30%	0.82%	1.04%	1.38%	0.46%	0.44%	0.98%	0.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RPG Invesco S&P 500 Pure Growth ETF	0.15%	0.24%	0.25%	1.44%	0.74%	0.00%	0.46%	0.83%	0.47%	0.56%	0.43%	0.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCTR and RPG in my portfolio?

FCTR and RPG have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FCTR or RPG?

RPG has higher volatility (11.10%) compared to FCTR (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs RPG's -53.27%.

Which ETF is better, FCTR or RPG?

On 5-year performance, RPG leads with 11.61% vs 3.73% for FCTR. On fees, RPG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, FCTR has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FCTR or RPG?

Over the 5-year period, RPG has performed better with a 11.61% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FCTR or RPG?

RPG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FCTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FCTR or RPG?

FCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.15% for RPG.

What is the main difference between FCTR and RPG?

FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while RPG tracks S&P 500/Citigroup Pure Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.35% for RPG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.