FCTR vs. ROBT
FCTR (First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCTR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FCTR returned 4.29%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for ROBT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
FCTR vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 14.22% return.
FCTR
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 8.63%
- YTD
- 15.16%
- 6M
- 15.25%
- 1Y
- 23.34%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 4.29%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FCTR vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 15.16% | 8.63% | 19.54% | 0.71% | -20.42% | 21.13% | 30.17% | 30.91% | -12.94% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.22% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -16.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCTR and ROBT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018 | 0.82 |
The correlation between FCTR and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCTR vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCTR
ROBT
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
Technology
FCTR
ROBT
Financial Services
FCTR
ROBT
Healthcare
FCTR
ROBT
Industrials
FCTR
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
FCTR
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
FCTR
ROBT
Real Estate
FCTR
ROBT
-
Energy
FCTR
ROBT
Basic Materials
FCTR
ROBT
-
Utilities
FCTR
ROBT
-
Communication Services
FCTR
ROBT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCTR vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
FCTR
ROBT
FCTR vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCTR | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 1.42 | +0.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.66 | 4.09 | +3.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCTR | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.09 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.35 | +0.12 |
Drawdowns
FCTR vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCTR | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.10% | -44.47% | +7.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.17% | -21.66% | +10.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.63% | -27.68% | +5.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.10% | -43.26% | +6.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.76% | -1.73% | +0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.40% | -15.97% | +5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.05% | 7.53% | -4.48% |
Volatility
FCTR vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 6.46%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCTR | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 6.46% | +0.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 17.51% | -5.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.53% | 23.32% | -5.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.64% | 25.18% | -5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 25.48% | -3.54% |
FCTR vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FCTR and ROBT have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
FCTR vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCTR First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF | 0.35% | 0.30% | 0.82% | 1.04% | 1.38% | 0.46% | 0.44% | 0.98% | 0.66% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCTR and ROBT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FCTR has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to ROBT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, FCTR leads with 4.29% vs 2.38% for ROBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FCTR has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCTR and ROBT have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
FCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index.
FCTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCTR and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer