PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. ROBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 15.16% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 14.22% return.


FCTR

1D
-0.76%
1M
8.63%
YTD
15.16%
6M
15.25%
1Y
23.34%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
4.29%
10Y*

ROBT

1D
-1.73%
1M
13.18%
YTD
14.22%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.71%
3Y*
10.10%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
15.16%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.94%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
14.22%15.16%-0.41%27.77%-34.94%9.91%46.18%34.28%-16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and ROBT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.82

The correlation between FCTR and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
ROBT

Technology

19.3%
57.0%

Financial Services

18.7%
1.6%

Healthcare

9.4%
7.4%

Industrials

9.4%
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

8.1%
1.4%

Real Estate

7.8%

-

Energy

6.5%
1.5%

Basic Materials

4.6%

-

Utilities

4.3%

-

Communication Services

3.5%
4.1%

Technology

FCTR
19.3%
ROBT
57.0%

Financial Services

FCTR
18.7%
ROBT
1.6%

Healthcare

FCTR
9.4%
ROBT
7.4%

Industrials

FCTR
9.4%
ROBT
20.4%

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
8.5%
ROBT
6.6%

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
8.1%
ROBT
1.4%

Real Estate

FCTR
7.8%
ROBT

-

Energy

FCTR
6.5%
ROBT
1.5%

Basic Materials

FCTR
4.6%
ROBT

-

Utilities

FCTR
4.3%
ROBT

-

Communication Services

FCTR
3.5%
ROBT
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBT
ROBT Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ROBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBT Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCTRROBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

1.42

+0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.66

4.09

+3.57

FCTR vs. ROBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.34, which is comparable to the ROBT Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and ROBT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCTRROBTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34

1.32

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.09

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.35

+0.12

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and ROBT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRROBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-44.47%

+7.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-21.66%

+10.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-27.68%

+5.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-43.26%

+6.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-1.73%

+0.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

-15.97%

+5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

7.53%

-4.48%

Volatility

FCTR vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) at 6.46%. This indicates that FCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRROBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

6.46%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.84%

17.51%

-5.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.53%

23.32%

-5.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.64%

25.18%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

25.48%

-3.54%

FCTR vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FCTR and ROBT have an expense ratio of 0.65%.


Dividends

FCTR vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.35%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%
ROBT
First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF
0.00%0.00%0.68%0.23%0.35%0.06%0.17%0.42%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and ROBT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCTR has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to ROBT (6.46%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs ROBT's -44.47%.

On 5-year performance, FCTR leads with 4.29% vs 2.38% for ROBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. On volatility, ROBT has been the lower-risk option at 6.46%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCTR has performed better with a 4.29% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCTR and ROBT have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.

FCTR has the higher dividend yield at 0.35%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.

FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index.

FCTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.34 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and ROBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer