PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCTR vs. GRID
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCTR vs. GRID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCTR achieves a 12.71% return, which is significantly lower than GRID's 23.03% return.


FCTR

1D
0.00%
1M
2.53%
YTD
12.71%
6M
10.54%
1Y
20.02%
3Y*
17.59%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*

GRID

1D
-0.30%
1M
-2.26%
YTD
23.03%
6M
21.65%
1Y
39.31%
3Y*
24.08%
5Y*
16.47%
10Y*
19.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCTR vs. GRID - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
12.71%8.63%19.54%0.71%-20.42%21.13%30.17%30.91%-12.50%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
23.03%29.65%15.18%21.57%-13.89%27.65%48.84%42.80%-21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FCTR and GRID is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018

0.78

The correlation between FCTR and GRID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

FCTR vs. GRID - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCTR
GRID

Technology

36.5%
12.5%

Industrials

18.5%
24.2%

Financial Services

8.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.9%
2.3%

Healthcare

6.7%

-

Basic Materials

5.7%
0.0%

Energy

4.7%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.3%

-

Communication Services

2.9%

-

Utilities

2.7%
3.9%

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Technology

FCTR
36.5%
GRID
12.5%

Industrials

FCTR
18.5%
GRID
24.2%

Financial Services

FCTR
8.5%
GRID

-

Consumer Cyclical

FCTR
7.9%
GRID
2.3%

Healthcare

FCTR
6.7%
GRID

-

Basic Materials

FCTR
5.7%
GRID
0.0%

Energy

FCTR
4.7%
GRID
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FCTR
4.3%
GRID

-

Communication Services

FCTR
2.9%
GRID

-

Utilities

FCTR
2.7%
GRID
3.9%

Real Estate

FCTR
1.6%
GRID

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCTR vs. GRID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCTR
FCTR Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FCTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTR Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTR Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GRID
GRID Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
GRID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRID Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRID Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
GRID Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRID Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCTR vs. GRID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) and First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCTRGRIDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.37

-1.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.47

11.90

-5.43

FCTR vs. GRID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the GRID Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCTR and GRID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCTR vs. GRID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCTR drawdown since its inception was -37.10%, smaller than the maximum GRID drawdown of -40.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCTR and GRID.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCTRGRIDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.10%

-40.56%

+3.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.17%

-11.73%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.63%

-20.77%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.10%

-29.64%

-7.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.88%

-5.83%

+2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.34%

-8.42%

-1.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

3.31%

-0.21%

Volatility

FCTR vs. GRID - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF (FCTR) is 6.86%, while First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund (GRID) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that FCTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GRID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCTRGRIDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.86%

10.09%

-3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.51%

18.22%

-5.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.30%

21.25%

-2.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

21.36%

-1.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.96%

22.79%

-0.83%

FCTR vs. GRID - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCTR has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than GRID's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCTR vs. GRID - Dividend Comparison

FCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than GRID's 0.80% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTR
First Trust Lunt U.S. Factor Rotation ETF
0.36%0.30%0.82%1.04%1.38%0.46%0.44%0.98%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GRID
First Trust NASDAQ Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index Fund
0.80%1.01%1.06%1.23%1.26%0.63%0.68%1.26%1.28%1.07%1.07%1.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCTR and GRID have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GRID has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to FCTR (6.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCTR dropped -37.10% vs GRID's -40.56%.

On 5-year performance, GRID leads with 16.47% vs 3.73% for FCTR. On fees, FCTR is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FCTR has been the lower-risk option at 6.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GRID has performed better with a 16.47% return vs 3.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCTR is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for GRID.

GRID has the higher dividend yield at 0.80%, compared with 0.36% for FCTR.

FCTR is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GRID is Alternative Energy Equities. FCTR tracks Lunt Capital Large Cap Factor Rotation Index, while GRID tracks Nasdaq Clean Edge Smart Grid Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FCTR and 0.70% for GRID.

GRID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCTR and GRID

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer