FCPGX vs. QUASX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

FCPGX (Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund) and QUASX (AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FCPGX returned 15.63%/yr vs 15.39%/yr for QUASX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FCPGX charges 1.00%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for QUASX.

Performance

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FCPGX having a 23.66% return and QUASX slightly lower at 22.86%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCPGX having a 15.63% annualized return and QUASX not far behind at 15.39%.

FCPGX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 4.02%
• YTD: 23.66%
• 6M: 19.72%
• 1Y: 42.05%
• 3Y*: 22.35%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 15.63%

QUASX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 2.28%
• YTD: 22.86%
• 6M: 18.71%
• 1Y: 33.31%
• 3Y*: 17.18%
• 5Y*: 2.39%
• 10Y*: 15.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	23.66%	11.20%	20.56%	19.02%	-25.34%	10.50%	36.41%	36.31%	-4.57%	28.99%
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio	22.86%	4.85%	18.49%	17.83%	-39.09%	9.76%	53.85%	49.85%	-1.02%	34.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FCPGX and QUASX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2004	0.96

The correlation between FCPGX and QUASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCPGX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCPGX

FCPGX Risk / Return Rank: 62
FCPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FCPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FCPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
FCPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FCPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

QUASX

QUASX Risk / Return Rank: 34
QUASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
QUASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
QUASX Omega Ratio Rank: 27
QUASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
QUASX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCPGX	QUASX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.84	1.31	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.50	1.87	+0.63
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.23	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.12	2.15	+0.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.42	7.88	+4.54

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCPGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.84, which is higher than the QUASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCPGX and QUASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, roughly equal to the maximum QUASX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and QUASX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCPGX	QUASX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.11%	-60.97%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-15.02%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.69%	-31.68%	+2.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-39.04%	-47.37%	+8.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.04%	-47.37%	+8.33%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.28%	-2.25%	+0.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.67%	-15.73%	+5.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.29%	4.09%	-0.80%

Volatility

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) have volatilities of 8.05% and 8.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCPGX	QUASX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	8.43%	-0.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.32%	19.37%	-2.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.26%	24.68%	-2.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.69%	26.53%	-2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.92%	25.59%	-2.67%

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCPGX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison

FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.16%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund	5.16%	6.38%	1.37%	0.00%	0.00%	19.27%	8.19%	5.31%	14.35%	6.88%	1.53%	4.32%
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	9.07%	9.86%	18.20%	19.70%	9.29%	2.32%	9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCPGX and QUASX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, FCPGX and QUASX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCPGX or QUASX?

QUASX has higher volatility (8.43%) compared to FCPGX (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCPGX dropped -59.11% vs QUASX's -60.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.