FCPGX vs. QUASX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX).
FCPGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 3, 2004. QUASX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Feb 12, 1969.
Performance
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | -0.83% | 11.20% | 20.56% | 19.02% | -25.34% | 10.50% | 36.41% | 36.31% | -4.57% | 28.99% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | -2.76% | 4.85% | 18.49% | 17.83% | -39.09% | 9.76% | 53.85% | 49.85% | -1.02% | 34.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCPGX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly higher than QUASX's -2.76% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FCPGX having a 13.40% annualized return and QUASX not far behind at 12.88%.
FCPGX
- 1D
- 4.93%
- 1M
- -6.50%
- YTD
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 2.23%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.88%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.40%
QUASX
- 1D
- 5.42%
- 1M
- -6.49%
- YTD
- -2.76%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 9.04%
- 5Y*
- -1.90%
- 10Y*
- 12.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCPGX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than QUASX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCPGX vs. QUASX — Risk / Return Rank
FCPGX
QUASX
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) and AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCPGX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.47 | 1.12 | +0.35 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.15 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 1.16 | +0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.35 | 3.97 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCPGX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | -0.07 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.51 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.36 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCPGX and QUASX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Dividend Comparison
FCPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, while QUASX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCPGX Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund | 6.44% | 6.38% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 19.27% | 8.19% | 5.31% | 14.35% | 6.88% | 1.53% | 4.32% |
QUASX AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 9.07% | 9.86% | 18.20% | 19.70% | 9.29% | 2.32% | 9.19% |
Drawdowns
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCPGX drawdown since its inception was -59.11%, roughly equal to the maximum QUASX drawdown of -60.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCPGX and QUASX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCPGX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.11% | -60.97% | +1.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.76% | -15.10% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.04% | -47.37% | +8.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.04% | -47.37% | +8.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -21.00% | +12.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.77% | -15.78% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.69% | 4.42% | -0.73% |
Volatility
FCPGX vs. QUASX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Small Cap Growth Fund (FCPGX) is 9.87%, while AB Small Cap Growth Portfolio (QUASX) has a volatility of 11.33%. This indicates that FCPGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QUASX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCPGX | QUASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.87% | 11.33% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.73% | 19.12% | -2.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.94% | 28.12% | -3.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.43% | 26.28% | -2.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.74% | 25.44% | -2.70% |