FCGSX vs. IMCG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG).
FCGSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 7, 2013. IMCG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar US Mid Cap Broad Growth Index. It was launched on Jun 28, 2004.
Performance
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | -6.64% | 25.52% | 38.00% | 45.97% | -32.15% | 25.13% | 70.01% | 39.75% | -4.03% | 37.69% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | -1.19% | 6.55% | 18.14% | 20.73% | -25.79% | 15.39% | 45.64% | 35.70% | -3.68% | 25.57% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCGSX achieves a -6.64% return, which is significantly lower than IMCG's -1.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FCGSX has outperformed IMCG with an annualized return of 21.43%, while IMCG has yielded a comparatively lower 12.58% annualized return.
FCGSX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- -8.19%
- YTD
- -6.64%
- 6M
- -2.02%
- 1Y
- 33.82%
- 3Y*
- 27.05%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 21.43%
IMCG
- 1D
- 3.63%
- 1M
- -6.39%
- YTD
- -1.19%
- 6M
- -4.39%
- 1Y
- 11.14%
- 3Y*
- 11.94%
- 5Y*
- 5.08%
- 10Y*
- 12.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCGSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than IMCG's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FCGSX vs. IMCG — Risk / Return Rank
FCGSX
IMCG
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCGSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.40 | 0.55 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.02 | 0.92 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.12 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 0.87 | +1.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.23 | 3.61 | +6.62 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCGSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.40 | 0.55 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.25 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.93 | 0.62 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.50 | +0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCGSX and IMCG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Dividend Comparison
FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.22%, more than IMCG's 0.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCGSX Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund | 11.22% | 10.48% | 12.49% | 3.13% | 0.61% | 38.65% | 31.99% | 11.06% | 13.21% | 10.51% | 2.44% | 0.25% |
IMCG iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF | 0.80% | 0.78% | 0.78% | 0.85% | 0.91% | 0.41% | 0.09% | 0.30% | 0.35% | 0.45% | 0.52% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -38.77%, smaller than the maximum IMCG drawdown of -58.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and IMCG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCGSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.77% | -58.96% | +20.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.10% | -12.99% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.77% | -35.08% | -3.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.77% | -35.08% | -3.69% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.42% | -6.90% | -3.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.05% | -9.29% | +2.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 3.14% | -0.26% |
Volatility
FCGSX vs. IMCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) is 6.66%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IMCG) has a volatility of 7.19%. This indicates that FCGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCGSX | IMCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.66% | 7.19% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 12.08% | +1.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.80% | 20.27% | +3.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.62% | 20.09% | +3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.15% | 20.44% | +2.71% |