FCGSX vs. FSPGX

In the year-to-date period, FCGSX achieves a -2.46% return, which is significantly lower than FSPGX's 0.23% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

FCGSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGSX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.

The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and FSPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) is 6.27%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 6.88%. This indicates that FCGSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.