PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCGSX vs. FSPGX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCGSX and FSPGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%150.00%200.00%250.00%300.00%350.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
105.97%
344.48%
FCGSX
FSPGX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCGSX:

1.09

FSPGX:

1.96

Sortino Ratio

FCGSX:

1.42

FSPGX:

2.56

Omega Ratio

FCGSX:

1.22

FSPGX:

1.35

Calmar Ratio

FCGSX:

0.74

FSPGX:

2.65

Martin Ratio

FCGSX:

4.58

FSPGX:

10.03

Ulcer Index

FCGSX:

5.35%

FSPGX:

3.47%

Daily Std Dev

FCGSX:

22.55%

FSPGX:

17.71%

Max Drawdown

FCGSX:

-55.95%

FSPGX:

-32.66%

Current Drawdown

FCGSX:

-18.03%

FSPGX:

-2.74%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCGSX having a 1.29% return and FSPGX slightly higher at 1.35%.


FCGSX

YTD

1.29%

1M

1.12%

6M

0.57%

1Y

20.85%

5Y*

5.75%

10Y*

7.92%

FSPGX

YTD

1.35%

1M

0.95%

6M

12.82%

1Y

31.07%

5Y*

18.17%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
Expense ratio chart for FSPGX: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%
Expense ratio chart for FCGSX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCGSX vs. FSPGX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCGSX is 5252
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPGX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FSPGX is 8585
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FSPGX is 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 1.09, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.001.091.96
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 1.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.001.422.56
The chart of Omega ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 1.22, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.221.35
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 0.73, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.742.65
The chart of Martin ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 4.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.5810.03
FCGSX
FSPGX

The current FCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGSX and FSPGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.09
1.96
FCGSX
FSPGX

Dividends

FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, more than FSPGX's 0.37% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
0.50%0.51%0.52%0.61%0.58%0.68%0.72%1.06%0.51%0.11%0.25%0.93%
FSPGX
Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund
0.37%0.37%0.73%0.86%0.54%0.74%0.99%1.14%0.99%0.30%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and FSPGX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-18.03%
-2.74%
FCGSX
FSPGX

Volatility

FCGSX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) have volatilities of 6.42% and 6.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.42%
6.35%
FCGSX
FSPGX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab