PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FCGSX vs. FBGRX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FCGSX and FBGRX is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.01.0

Performance

FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-1.41%
5.39%
FCGSX
FBGRX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FCGSX:

0.99

FBGRX:

1.51

Sortino Ratio

FCGSX:

1.32

FBGRX:

2.04

Omega Ratio

FCGSX:

1.20

FBGRX:

1.28

Calmar Ratio

FCGSX:

0.65

FBGRX:

2.06

Martin Ratio

FCGSX:

4.22

FBGRX:

6.27

Ulcer Index

FCGSX:

5.29%

FBGRX:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

FCGSX:

22.53%

FBGRX:

20.58%

Max Drawdown

FCGSX:

-55.95%

FBGRX:

-55.96%

Current Drawdown

FCGSX:

-19.05%

FBGRX:

-4.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCGSX achieves a 0.04% return, which is significantly lower than FBGRX's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FCGSX has underperformed FBGRX with an annualized return of 7.87%, while FBGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.74% annualized return.


FCGSX

YTD

0.04%

1M

-3.15%

6M

-1.41%

1Y

22.95%

5Y*

5.50%

10Y*

7.87%

FBGRX

YTD

0.49%

1M

-3.54%

6M

5.39%

1Y

31.68%

5Y*

14.94%

10Y*

13.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCGSX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FBGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for FBGRX: current value at 0.79% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.79%
Expense ratio chart for FCGSX: current value at 0.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FCGSX vs. FBGRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCGSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCGSX is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCGSX is 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FBGRX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FBGRX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FBGRX is 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 0.99, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.991.51
The chart of Sortino ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.001.322.04
The chart of Omega ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 1.20, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.201.28
The chart of Calmar ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 0.65, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.652.06
The chart of Martin ratio for FCGSX, currently valued at 4.22, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.004.226.27
FCGSX
FBGRX

The current FCGSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FBGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCGSX and FBGRX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
0.99
1.51
FCGSX
FBGRX

Dividends

FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Dividend Comparison

FCGSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, more than FBGRX's 0.23% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
0.51%0.51%0.52%0.61%0.58%0.68%0.72%1.06%0.51%0.11%0.25%0.93%
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
0.23%0.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.12%0.09%0.22%5.07%6.08%

Drawdowns

FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCGSX drawdown since its inception was -55.95%, roughly equal to the maximum FBGRX drawdown of -55.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCGSX and FBGRX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-19.05%
-4.22%
FCGSX
FBGRX

Volatility

FCGSX vs. FBGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) have volatilities of 6.34% and 6.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.34%
6.41%
FCGSX
FBGRX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab