PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCG vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCG vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 27.71% return, which is significantly higher than KNG's 2.20% return.


FCG

1D
1.02%
1M
-6.03%
YTD
27.71%
6M
20.12%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
12.75%
5Y*
16.52%
10Y*
4.65%

KNG

1D
-0.04%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.20%
6M
2.33%
1Y
7.44%
3Y*
7.06%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCG vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
27.71%-2.28%4.16%2.55%47.24%98.49%-23.20%-15.76%-26.82%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
2.20%6.63%5.99%7.48%-7.03%24.78%7.21%26.64%-0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FCG and KNG is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2018

0.44

Over the past year, the correlation between FCG and KNG has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.44, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FCG vs. KNG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCG
KNG

Energy

99.2%
3.0%

Technology

0.8%
4.3%

Basic Materials

-

10.2%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

5.5%

Consumer Defensive

-

23.5%

Financial Services

-

12.7%

Healthcare

-

10.1%

Industrials

-

20.3%

Real Estate

-

4.4%

Utilities

-

6.1%

Energy

FCG
99.2%
KNG
3.0%

Technology

FCG
0.8%
KNG
4.3%

Basic Materials

FCG

-

KNG
10.2%

Communication Services

FCG

-

KNG

-

Consumer Cyclical

FCG

-

KNG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

FCG

-

KNG
23.5%

Financial Services

FCG

-

KNG
12.7%

Healthcare

FCG

-

KNG
10.1%

Industrials

FCG

-

KNG
20.3%

Real Estate

FCG

-

KNG
4.4%

Utilities

FCG

-

KNG
6.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCG vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCG
FCG Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
FCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
FCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCG Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCG vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCGKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.54

0.87

+1.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.56

2.25

+3.31

FCG vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is higher than the KNG Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCG and KNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCGKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

0.73

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.32

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.49

-0.60

Drawdowns

FCG vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than KNG's maximum drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCGKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.20%

-35.12%

-62.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.07%

-8.61%

-4.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.44%

-14.24%

-15.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.33%

-18.20%

-15.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.25%

-5.89%

-68.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.38%

-4.13%

-61.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.95%

3.32%

+2.63%

Volatility

FCG vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 9.60% compared to FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG) at 2.29%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCGKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

2.29%

+7.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.15%

7.39%

+12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.75%

10.19%

+16.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.46%

13.59%

+19.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.30%

17.18%

+21.12%

FCG vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCG vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than KNG's 8.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCG
First Trust Natural Gas ETF
2.15%2.86%2.76%3.25%3.04%1.73%3.82%2.87%1.46%1.56%1.70%4.79%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.67%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCG and KNG have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCG has higher volatility (9.60%) compared to KNG (2.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCG dropped -97.20% vs KNG's -35.12%.

On 5-year performance, FCG leads with 16.52% vs 4.31% for KNG. On fees, FCG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, KNG has been the lower-risk option at 2.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FCG has performed better with a 16.52% return vs 4.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FCG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for KNG.

KNG has the higher dividend yield at 8.67%, compared with 2.15% for FCG.

FCG is categorized as Energy Equities, while KNG is Dividend. FCG tracks ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index, while KNG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income Index Monthly Series. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FCG and 0.75% for KNG.

FCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.24 vs 0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCG and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer