FCG vs. ENFR
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR).
FCG and ENFR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FCG is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the ISE-Revere Natural Gas Index. It was launched on May 8, 2007. ENFR is a passively managed fund by SS&C that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Nov 1, 2013. Both FCG and ENFR are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
FCG vs. ENFR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FCG vs. ENFR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 35.99% | -2.28% | 4.16% | 2.55% | 47.24% | 98.49% | -23.20% | -15.76% | -34.81% | -11.38% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 22.85% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCG achieves a 35.99% return, which is significantly higher than ENFR's 22.85% return. Over the past 10 years, FCG has underperformed ENFR with an annualized return of 7.31%, while ENFR has yielded a comparatively higher 13.64% annualized return.
FCG
- 1D
- -1.95%
- 1M
- 13.98%
- YTD
- 35.99%
- 6M
- 36.46%
- 1Y
- 30.79%
- 3Y*
- 15.23%
- 5Y*
- 22.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.31%
ENFR
- 1D
- -1.39%
- 1M
- 4.03%
- YTD
- 22.85%
- 6M
- 20.70%
- 1Y
- 22.29%
- 3Y*
- 28.68%
- 5Y*
- 23.59%
- 10Y*
- 13.64%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FCG vs. ENFR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FCG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than ENFR's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FCG vs. ENFR — Risk / Return Rank
FCG
ENFR
FCG vs. ENFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) and Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.63 | -0.27 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.25 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 1.49 | -0.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 4.94 | -1.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 | 1.25 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 | 1.24 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.55 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.10 | 0.34 | -0.45 |
Correlation
The correlation between FCG and ENFR is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FCG vs. ENFR - Dividend Comparison
FCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.02%, less than ENFR's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCG First Trust Natural Gas ETF | 2.02% | 2.86% | 2.76% | 3.25% | 3.04% | 1.73% | 3.82% | 2.87% | 1.46% | 1.56% | 1.70% | 4.79% |
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.02% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
Drawdowns
FCG vs. ENFR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCG drawdown since its inception was -97.20%, which is greater than ENFR's maximum drawdown of -68.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCG and ENFR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.20% | -68.28% | -28.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.23% | -14.80% | -8.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.33% | -20.29% | -13.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.04% | -62.64% | -22.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.58% | -2.18% | -70.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -65.30% | -16.16% | -49.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 4.47% | +3.66% |
Volatility
FCG vs. ENFR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Natural Gas ETF (FCG) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) at 3.72%. This indicates that FCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FCG | ENFR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.09% | 3.72% | +2.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.28% | 10.21% | +8.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.42% | 17.91% | +14.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.88% | 19.18% | +14.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.28% | 24.74% | +13.54% |