FCFY vs. CIBR
FCFY (First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF) and CIBR (First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FCFY is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FCFY returned 20.70% vs 25.78% for CIBR. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.60% expense ratio.
Performance
FCFY vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FCFY achieves a 3.09% return, which is significantly lower than CIBR's 28.52% return.
FCFY
- 1D
- -1.02%
- 1M
- 5.88%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 4.54%
- 1Y
- 20.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- -2.81%
- 1M
- 31.43%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 24.03%
- 1Y
- 25.78%
- 3Y*
- 28.32%
- 5Y*
- 16.28%
- 10Y*
- 18.49%
FCFY vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 3.09% | 16.76% | 11.28% | 11.06% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 28.52% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 20.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FCFY and CIBR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between FCFY and CIBR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
FCFY vs. CIBR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FCFY
CIBR
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FCFY
CIBR
Financial Services
FCFY
CIBR
-
Communication Services
FCFY
CIBR
Healthcare
FCFY
CIBR
-
Consumer Cyclical
FCFY
CIBR
-
Industrials
FCFY
CIBR
Consumer Defensive
FCFY
CIBR
-
Energy
FCFY
CIBR
-
Utilities
FCFY
CIBR
-
Real Estate
FCFY
CIBR
-
Basic Materials
FCFY
CIBR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FCFY vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FCFY
CIBR
FCFY vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FCFY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.20 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.74 | 1.18 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.64 | 2.79 | +1.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FCFY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.06 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.88 | 0.67 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
FCFY vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FCFY drawdown since its inception was -21.36%, smaller than the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCFY and CIBR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FCFY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.36% | -33.89% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.94% | -21.99% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -21.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.17% | -2.81% | +0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -8.66% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.47% | 9.25% | -4.78% |
Volatility
FCFY vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF (FCFY) is 4.72%, while First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) has a volatility of 10.90%. This indicates that FCFY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FCFY | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.72% | 10.90% | -6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.29% | 20.90% | -9.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.39% | 24.50% | -8.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 24.95% | -7.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 23.60% | -6.06% |
FCFY vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FCFY and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Dividends
FCFY vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FCFY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than CIBR's 0.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.45% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
FCFY First Trust S&P 500 Diversified Free Cash Flow ETF | 1.43% | 1.48% | 1.76% | 0.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FCFY and CIBR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CIBR has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to FCFY (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCFY dropped -21.36% vs CIBR's -33.89%.
On 1-year performance, CIBR leads with 25.78% vs 20.70% for FCFY. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, FCFY has been the lower-risk option at 4.72%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CIBR has performed better with a 25.78% return vs 20.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FCFY and CIBR have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.
FCFY has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.45% for CIBR.
FCFY is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while CIBR is Technology Equities. FCFY tracks S&P 500 Sector-Neutral FCF Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CIBR tracks Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index.
FCFY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FCFY and CIBR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer