PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCASX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FCASX having a 11.02% return and WFSPX slightly higher at 11.33%. Over the past 10 years, FCASX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.45% annualized return.


FCASX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.49%
YTD
11.02%
6M
11.75%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
9.00%

WFSPX

1D
0.42%
1M
3.11%
YTD
11.33%
6M
11.01%
1Y
29.18%
3Y*
22.66%
5Y*
13.97%
10Y*
15.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
11.02%17.02%9.64%15.21%-17.67%12.74%15.96%21.50%-8.63%17.32%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.33%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FCASX and WFSPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2008

0.94

The correlation between FCASX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCASX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCASX
FCASX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCASX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FCASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCASXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.44

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.22

-0.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

15.03

-1.74

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCASX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCASXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.41

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.83

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.13

+0.45

Drawdowns

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCASX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCASX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-58.21%

+26.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-8.90%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-18.74%

+5.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-24.51%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-33.74%

+6.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.32%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-12.77%

+7.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.90%

-0.07%

Volatility

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) has a higher volatility of 3.31% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.87%. This indicates that FCASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

2.87%

+0.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

8.99%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

11.87%

-1.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

16.88%

-4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

18.02%

-5.39%

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCASX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCASX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

FCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than WFSPX's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
5.57%6.18%3.48%0.65%5.52%1.62%1.22%4.03%5.09%2.76%0.20%4.47%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.57%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FCASX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCASX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to WFSPX (2.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCASX dropped -31.48% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCASX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer