PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCASX vs. NASDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCASX vs. NASDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCASX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly lower than NASDX's 11.51% return. Over the past 10 years, FCASX has underperformed NASDX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while NASDX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.92% annualized return.


FCASX

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.78%
6M
6.47%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
8.66%
ALL TIME*
7.99%

NASDX

1D
3.35%
1M
-4.19%
6M
10.25%
YTD
11.51%
1Y
24.16%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
16.05%
10Y*
20.92%
ALL TIME*
8.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCASX vs. NASDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
9.59%17.02%9.64%15.21%-17.67%12.74%15.96%21.50%-8.63%17.32%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
11.51%21.00%36.91%54.69%-32.57%27.32%48.59%38.22%-1.21%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FCASX and NASDX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

0.87

The correlation between FCASX and NASDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCASX vs. NASDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCASX
FCASX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCASX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FCASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

NASDX
NASDX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
NASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
NASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCASX vs. NASDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCASXNASDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.19

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

1.78

+0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

5.80

+3.51

FCASX vs. NASDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is higher than the NASDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCASX and NASDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCASX vs. NASDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCASX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum NASDX drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCASX and NASDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASXNASDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-83.16%

+51.68%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-11.90%

+3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-22.71%

+9.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-35.33%

+11.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-35.33%

+8.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-8.13%

+6.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-34.19%

+29.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

3.64%

-1.72%

Volatility

FCASX vs. NASDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) is 3.32%, while Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares (NASDX) has a volatility of 6.86%. This indicates that FCASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASXNASDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

6.86%

-3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

15.95%

-6.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

19.34%

-7.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

23.54%

-11.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

22.87%

-10.21%

FCASX vs. NASDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCASX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than NASDX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCASX vs. NASDX - Dividend Comparison

FCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than NASDX's 3.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
5.64%6.18%3.48%0.65%5.52%1.62%1.22%4.03%5.09%2.76%0.20%4.47%
NASDX
Shelton Capital Management Nasdaq-100 Index Fund Direct Shares
3.23%3.76%16.95%7.61%3.75%2.59%1.28%7.09%2.47%1.65%0.75%0.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FCASX and NASDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

NASDX has higher volatility (6.86%) compared to FCASX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCASX dropped -31.48% vs NASDX's -83.16%.

FCASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCASX and NASDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer