PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCASX vs. FCSRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCASX achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than FCSRX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, FCASX has outperformed FCSRX with an annualized return of 8.66%, while FCSRX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.42% annualized return.


FCASX

1D
1.70%
1M
-0.78%
6M
6.47%
YTD
9.59%
1Y
19.31%
3Y*
13.08%
5Y*
6.50%
10Y*
8.66%
ALL TIME*
7.99%

FCSRX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.77%
6M
2.98%
YTD
6.55%
1Y
12.24%
3Y*
7.14%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
4.42%
ALL TIME*
2.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
9.59%17.02%9.64%15.21%-17.67%12.74%15.96%21.50%-8.63%17.32%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
6.55%9.27%4.75%3.60%-4.26%14.68%2.60%9.54%-5.03%3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FCASX and FCSRX is 0.36, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.62

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2008

0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FCASX and FCSRX has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCASX vs. FCSRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCASX
FCASX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FCASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCASX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FCASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

FCSRX
FCSRX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCSRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCSRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCSRX Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FCSRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCSRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCASXFCSRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.47

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

3.36

-1.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.31

10.54

-1.23

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCASX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is lower than the FCSRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCASX and FCSRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCASX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum FCSRX drawdown of -33.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCASX and FCSRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASXFCSRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-33.91%

+2.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-3.50%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-5.85%

-7.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-13.22%

-11.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-20.02%

-7.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-2.33%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.79%

-5.07%

+0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.11%

+0.81%

Volatility

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) has a higher volatility of 3.32% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C (FCSRX) at 1.62%. This indicates that FCASX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASXFCSRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

1.62%

+1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.76%

3.78%

+5.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.54%

4.88%

+6.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.46%

6.90%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.66%

6.71%

+5.95%

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCASX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSRX's 1.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCASX vs. FCSRX - Dividend Comparison

FCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than FCSRX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
5.64%6.18%3.48%0.65%5.52%1.62%1.22%4.03%5.09%2.76%0.20%4.47%
FCSRX
Fidelity Advisor Strategic Real Return Fund Class C
2.54%3.74%3.86%4.35%6.51%4.53%1.32%2.20%8.51%1.58%1.34%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCASX and FCSRX have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCASX has higher volatility (3.32%) compared to FCSRX (1.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCASX dropped -31.48% vs FCSRX's -33.91%.

FCSRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCASX and FCSRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer