PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCASX vs. LIVIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCASX achieves a 11.02% return, which is significantly lower than LIVIX's 12.57% return. Over the past 10 years, FCASX has underperformed LIVIX with an annualized return of 9.00%, while LIVIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


FCASX

1D
0.24%
1M
1.49%
YTD
11.02%
6M
11.75%
1Y
24.30%
3Y*
15.20%
5Y*
7.10%
10Y*
9.00%

LIVIX

1D
0.41%
1M
2.10%
YTD
12.57%
6M
13.11%
1Y
29.28%
3Y*
19.89%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
11.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
11.02%17.02%9.64%15.21%-17.67%12.74%15.96%21.50%-8.63%17.32%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
12.57%21.57%13.60%21.62%-18.38%18.75%14.99%26.76%-7.83%21.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FCASX and LIVIX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2011

0.97

The correlation between FCASX and LIVIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCASX vs. LIVIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCASX
FCASX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCASX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FCASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCASX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

LIVIX
LIVIX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LIVIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIVIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIVIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LIVIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIVIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) and BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCASXLIVIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.42

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.09

-0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.29

13.69

-0.40

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCASX Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the LIVIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCASX and LIVIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCASXLIVIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.32

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.65

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

0.72

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Drawdowns

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCASX drawdown since its inception was -31.48%, smaller than the maximum LIVIX drawdown of -34.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCASX and LIVIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCASXLIVIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.48%

-34.44%

+2.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-9.44%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.91%

-17.39%

+4.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.31%

-26.45%

+2.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.25%

-34.44%

+7.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-0.46%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-4.52%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

2.13%

-0.30%

Volatility

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C (FCASX) is 3.31%, while BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund (LIVIX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that FCASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LIVIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCASXLIVIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

3.84%

-0.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.41%

10.10%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.35%

12.57%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.26%

15.84%

-3.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

16.71%

-4.08%

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCASX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LIVIX's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCASX vs. LIVIX - Dividend Comparison

FCASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.57%, more than LIVIX's 2.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCASX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 70% Fund Class C
5.57%6.18%3.48%0.65%5.52%1.62%1.22%4.03%5.09%2.76%0.20%4.47%
LIVIX
BlackRock LifePath Index 2055 Fund
2.20%2.48%0.01%2.04%1.96%2.04%1.56%2.95%2.35%2.27%1.54%2.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FCASX and LIVIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LIVIX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to FCASX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCASX dropped -31.48% vs LIVIX's -34.44%.

FCASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCASX and LIVIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer