FCAFX vs. URINX

Last updated Jul 22, 2026

FCAFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C) and URINX (USAA Target Retirement Income Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, FCAFX returned 3.12%/yr vs 5.56%/yr for URINX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FCAFX charges 1.47%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for URINX.

Performance

FCAFX vs. URINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCAFX achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than URINX's 5.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FCAFX has underperformed URINX with an annualized return of 3.12%, while URINX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.56% annualized return.

FCAFX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: -1.27%
• 6M: 2.51%
• YTD: 3.00%
• 1Y: 6.65%
• 3Y*: 6.02%
• 5Y*: 1.70%
• 10Y*: 3.12%
• ALL TIME*: 2.83%

URINX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: -0.34%
• 6M: 4.79%
• YTD: 5.53%
• 1Y: 11.11%
• 3Y*: 9.66%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: 5.56%
• ALL TIME*: 6.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCAFX vs. URINX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FCAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C	3.00%	9.01%	3.20%	7.08%	-12.28%	2.04%	7.69%	10.00%	-2.63%	6.38%
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund	5.53%	12.36%	6.66%	10.79%	-10.38%	6.47%	8.74%	11.72%	-3.00%	8.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAFX and URINX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2008	0.88

The correlation between FCAFX and URINX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FCAFX vs. URINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCAFX

FCAFX Risk / Return Rank: 42
FCAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
FCAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
FCAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 45
FCAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
FCAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

URINX

URINX Risk / Return Rank: 82
URINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
URINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
URINX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
URINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
URINX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCAFX vs. URINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FCAFX	URINX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.05	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.92	3.00	-1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.39	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	2.92	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.44	12.37	-4.93

FCAFX vs. URINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCAFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the URINX Sharpe Ratio of 2.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCAFX and URINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FCAFX vs. URINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCAFX drawdown since its inception was -20.01%, which is greater than URINX's maximum drawdown of -15.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCAFX and URINX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FCAFX	URINX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.01%	-15.27%	-4.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.83%	-3.92%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.99%	-4.84%	-0.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.75%	-15.27%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-16.75%	-15.27%	-1.48%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.27%	-0.72%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-1.91%	-0.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.92%	0.00%

Volatility

FCAFX vs. URINX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) has a higher volatility of 1.73% compared to USAA Target Retirement Income Fund (URINX) at 1.44%. This indicates that FCAFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FCAFX	URINX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.73%	1.44%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.57%	4.82%	-0.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.12%	5.61%	-0.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.49%	6.36%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.69%	5.86%	-1.17%

FCAFX vs. URINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than URINX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FCAFX vs. URINX - Dividend Comparison

FCAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than URINX's 5.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCAFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C	1.98%	2.28%	2.16%	1.93%	5.15%	4.75%	2.98%	2.75%	4.66%	2.52%	2.13%	2.20%
URINX USAA Target Retirement Income Fund	5.84%	6.07%	4.22%	3.48%	6.63%	6.66%	3.97%	6.37%	6.11%	5.68%	3.34%	4.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FCAFX and URINX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, FCAFX and URINX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FCAFX or URINX?

FCAFX has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to URINX (1.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FCAFX dropped -20.01% vs URINX's -15.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

URINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.05 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.