PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCAFX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCAFX

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.73%
6M
1.75%
YTD
3.00%
1Y
6.28%
3Y*
5.98%
5Y*
1.63%
10Y*
3.10%
ALL TIME*
2.83%

FRQIX

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C
3.00%9.01%3.20%7.08%-12.28%2.04%7.69%10.00%-2.63%6.38%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FCAFX and FRQIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.91

The correlation between FCAFX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCAFX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FCAFX
FCAFX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FCAFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCAFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCAFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
FCAFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCAFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C (FCAFX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FCAFXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.87

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAFXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCAFXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.70%

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCAFX has a 1.47% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCAFX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FCAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, less than FRQIX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCAFX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Income Fund Class C
1.74%2.28%2.16%1.93%5.15%4.75%2.98%2.75%4.66%2.52%2.13%2.20%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
2.78%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCAFX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCAFX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer