PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCA vs. MCHI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FCA vs. MCHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FCA vs. MCHI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
10.86%45.20%14.07%-8.28%-17.61%-0.65%11.80%18.72%-18.30%60.26%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
-6.48%31.04%17.73%-11.94%-23.01%-21.74%27.78%23.72%-19.79%54.67%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FCA achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than MCHI's -6.48% return. Over the past 10 years, FCA has outperformed MCHI with an annualized return of 9.40%, while MCHI has yielded a comparatively lower 4.66% annualized return.


FCA

1D
-0.29%
1M
-7.82%
YTD
10.86%
6M
8.68%
1Y
53.93%
3Y*
17.99%
5Y*
5.95%
10Y*
9.40%

MCHI

1D
2.24%
1M
-4.88%
YTD
-6.48%
6M
-13.64%
1Y
5.57%
3Y*
6.55%
5Y*
-5.65%
10Y*
4.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FCA vs. MCHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than MCHI's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FCA vs. MCHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCA
FCA Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

MCHI
MCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
MCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
MCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCA vs. MCHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCAMCHIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.07

0.23

+1.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.56

0.48

+2.08

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.06

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

0.31

+3.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.08

0.80

+14.28

FCA vs. MCHI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FCA Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is higher than the MCHI Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FCA and MCHI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCAMCHIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

0.23

+1.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.19

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

0.17

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

0.09

+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FCA and MCHI is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FCA vs. MCHI - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, more than MCHI's 2.26% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
2.32%2.67%5.17%5.70%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%
MCHI
iShares MSCI China ETF
2.26%2.12%2.31%2.66%1.78%1.04%1.04%1.45%1.60%1.56%1.66%2.76%

Drawdowns

FCA vs. MCHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FCA drawdown since its inception was -45.56%, smaller than the maximum MCHI drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FCA and MCHI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FCAMCHIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

-62.95%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.81%

-17.17%

+1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.47%

-57.18%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

-62.95%

+20.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.75%

-36.23%

+27.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.81%

-24.40%

+2.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

6.56%

-3.06%

Volatility

FCA vs. MCHI - Volatility Comparison

First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI) at 7.34%. This indicates that FCA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCHI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FCAMCHIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

7.34%

+0.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

14.85%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.19%

23.85%

+2.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.43%

30.68%

-3.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.57%

27.39%

-0.82%