PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FCA vs. CN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FCA vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FCA

1D
-0.93%
1M
-4.40%
YTD
10.95%
6M
9.35%
1Y
41.58%
3Y*
19.99%
5Y*
4.83%
10Y*
9.67%

CN

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FCA vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
10.95%45.20%14.07%-8.28%-17.61%-0.65%11.80%18.72%-18.30%60.26%
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.10%-11.87%-23.85%-12.74%31.55%26.79%-22.41%43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FCA and CN is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014

0.57

The correlation between FCA and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FCA vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FCA
CN

Industrials

25.2%
1.0%

Financial Services

19.7%
55.1%

Basic Materials

19.1%
0.6%

Energy

14.8%
0.9%

Technology

10.3%
0.3%

Healthcare

3.0%
0.8%

Communication Services

2.9%
0.4%

Utilities

2.4%
0.2%

Real Estate

1.1%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

1.1%
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

0.5%
0.3%

Industrials

FCA
25.2%
CN
1.0%

Financial Services

FCA
19.7%
CN
55.1%

Basic Materials

FCA
19.1%
CN
0.6%

Energy

FCA
14.8%
CN
0.9%

Technology

FCA
10.3%
CN
0.3%

Healthcare

FCA
3.0%
CN
0.8%

Communication Services

FCA
2.9%
CN
0.4%

Utilities

FCA
2.4%
CN
0.2%

Real Estate

FCA
1.1%
CN
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

FCA
1.1%
CN
5.4%

Consumer Defensive

FCA
0.5%
CN
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FCA vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FCA
FCA Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCA Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCA Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

CN
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FCA vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund (FCA) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FCACNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.55

FCA vs. CN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FCACNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.13

Drawdowns

FCA vs. CN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FCACNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.95%

Volatility

FCA vs. CN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FCACNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.62%

FCA vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FCA has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

FCA vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

FCA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.32%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CN
Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.04%1.80%2.00%0.78%4.18%2.09%0.81%11.41%14.00%
FCA
First Trust China AlphaDEX Fund
2.32%2.67%5.17%5.70%6.00%4.91%4.12%3.73%3.10%2.30%2.51%4.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


FCA and CN have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FCA.

FCA has the higher dividend yield at 2.32%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

FCA tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX China Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FCA and 0.50% for CN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FCA and CN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer