PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBY vs. VT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FBY vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FBY vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
-12.51%1.98%44.42%15.65%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
-1.71%22.43%16.49%3.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -12.51% return, which is significantly lower than VT's -1.71% return.


FBY

1D
4.34%
1M
-10.82%
YTD
-12.51%
6M
-21.11%
1Y
-6.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VT

1D
3.08%
1M
-6.22%
YTD
-1.71%
6M
1.42%
1Y
21.53%
3Y*
16.86%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FBY vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FBY vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY
FBY Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

VT
VT Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBYVTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.19

1.25

-1.44

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.04

1.84

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.27

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.21

1.83

-2.04

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.55

8.51

-9.05

FBY vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBY Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBY and VT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBYVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

1.25

-1.44

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.40

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and VT is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FBY vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.87%, more than VT's 1.82% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBY
YieldMax META Option Income ETF
58.87%55.43%53.89%8.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VT
Vanguard Total World Stock ETF
1.82%1.82%1.95%2.08%2.20%1.82%1.66%2.32%2.53%2.11%2.39%2.45%

Drawdowns

FBY vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and VT.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FBYVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.53%

-50.27%

+18.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.50%

-11.84%

-17.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.81%

-6.89%

-17.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.09%

-7.08%

-0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.21%

2.55%

+8.66%

Volatility

FBY vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) has a higher volatility of 11.85% compared to Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) at 6.33%. This indicates that FBY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FBYVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.85%

6.33%

+5.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.62%

9.95%

+12.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.41%

17.24%

+15.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.40%

15.98%

+12.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.40%

17.20%

+11.20%