FBY vs. METW

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW).

FBY and METW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBY is an actively managed fund by YieldMax. It was launched on Jul 27, 2023. METW is a passively managed fund by Roundhill that tracks the performance of the Ball Metaverse Index. It was launched on Jun 30, 2021.

Performance

FBY vs. METW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBY vs. METW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	-11.64%	-4.27%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	-15.94%	-8.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBY achieves a -11.64% return, which is significantly higher than METW's -15.94% return.

FBY

• 1D: 0.99%
• 1M: -10.78%
• YTD: -11.64%
• 6M: -18.62%
• 1Y: -6.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

METW

• 1D: 1.15%
• 1M: -14.03%
• YTD: -15.94%
• 6M: -24.67%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBY vs. METW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBY has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than METW's 0.59% expense ratio.

FBY

YieldMax META Option Income ETF

METW

Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF

Return for Risk

FBY vs. METW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBY

FBY Risk / Return Rank: 8
FBY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Omega Ratio Rank: 8
FBY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
FBY Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBY vs. METW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax META Option Income ETF (FBY) and Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF (METW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBY	METW	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.21	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.17	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.45	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBY	METW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	-0.68	+1.26

Correlation

The correlation between FBY and METW is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBY vs. METW - Dividend Comparison

FBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.29%, more than METW's 50.14% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FBY YieldMax META Option Income ETF	58.29%	55.43%	53.89%	8.31%
METW Roundhill Meta Weeklypay ETF	50.14%	30.89%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FBY vs. METW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBY drawdown since its inception was -31.53%, smaller than the maximum METW drawdown of -40.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBY and METW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBY	METW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.53%	-40.52%	+8.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.06%	-33.30%	+9.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.12%	-15.26%	+8.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.31%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBY	METW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.94%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.42%	41.86%	-9.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	28.38%	41.86%	-13.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	28.38%	41.86%	-13.48%