FBTU.L vs. CIBR
Compare and contrast key facts about First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR).
FBTU.L and CIBR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBTU.L is managed by First Trust. CIBR is a passively managed fund by First Trust that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq CTA Cybersecurity Index. It was launched on Jul 7, 2015.
Performance
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | -5.44% | 25.95% | 4.74% | 3.91% | -5.96% | -3.77% | 3.88% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | -12.12% | 13.06% | 18.21% | 39.71% | -26.46% | 19.67% | 36.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBTU.L achieves a -5.44% return, which is significantly higher than CIBR's -12.12% return.
FBTU.L
- 1D
- 2.87%
- 1M
- -4.92%
- YTD
- -5.44%
- 6M
- 12.00%
- 1Y
- 18.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.81%
- 5Y*
- 3.92%
- 10Y*
- —
CIBR
- 1D
- 3.11%
- 1M
- -0.19%
- YTD
- -12.12%
- 6M
- -17.17%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.62%
- 10Y*
- 14.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both FBTU.L and CIBR have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
FBTU.L vs. CIBR — Risk / Return Rank
FBTU.L
CIBR
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) and First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBTU.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.00 | +0.81 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.17 | +1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.03 | +1.29 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.61 | -0.07 | +3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBTU.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.00 | +0.81 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.36 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.16 | 0.51 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between FBTU.L and CIBR is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Dividend Comparison
FBTU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CIBR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTU.L First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CIBR First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF | 0.65% | 0.42% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.31% | 0.59% | 1.10% | 0.23% | 0.23% | 0.10% | 0.77% | 0.58% |
Drawdowns
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBTU.L drawdown since its inception was -33.73%, roughly equal to the maximum CIBR drawdown of -33.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBTU.L and CIBR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBTU.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.73% | -33.89% | +0.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.22% | -21.96% | +6.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.97% | -33.89% | +3.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.52% | -19.50% | +7.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.30% | -8.66% | -4.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 8.02% | -3.02% |
Volatility
FBTU.L vs. CIBR - Volatility Comparison
First Trust NYSE Arca Biotechnology UCITS ETF Class A USD Accumulating (FBTU.L) has a higher volatility of 7.43% compared to First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR) at 7.04%. This indicates that FBTU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIBR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FBTU.L | CIBR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.43% | 7.04% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.90% | 16.45% | -1.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.95% | 24.46% | -1.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.73% | 24.21% | -3.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.25% | 23.22% | -1.97% |