FBL vs. TSYY
FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FBL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while TSYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBL returned -29.78% vs -12.29% for TSYY. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBL charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSYY.
Performance
FBL vs. TSYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -19.72% return, which is significantly lower than TSYY's -16.60% return.
FBL
- 1D
- 8.48%
- 1M
- 2.55%
- YTD
- -19.72%
- 6M
- -15.34%
- 1Y
- -29.78%
- 3Y*
- 33.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -1.04%
- YTD
- -16.60%
- 6M
- -16.47%
- 1Y
- -12.29%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBL vs. TSYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | -19.72% | 0.50% | -4.04% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -16.60% | -15.96% | -0.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBL and TSYY is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024 | 0.39 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBL vs. TSYY — Risk / Return Rank
FBL
TSYY
FBL vs. TSYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | -0.39 | -0.04 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | -0.33 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 0.96 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | -0.45 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.91 | -0.85 | -0.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.42 | -0.39 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | -0.59 | +1.70 |
Drawdowns
FBL vs. TSYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than TSYY's maximum drawdown of -41.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and TSYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.15% | -41.52% | -19.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -61.03% | -27.31% | -33.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -47.97% | -36.69% | -11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.41% | -25.88% | +9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.76% | 14.49% | +18.27% |
Volatility
FBL vs. TSYY - Volatility Comparison
GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) at 4.86%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBL | TSYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.63% | 4.86% | +12.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 53.15% | 19.69% | +33.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.42% | 31.77% | +38.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.06% | 37.52% | +33.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.06% | 37.52% | +33.54% |
FBL vs. TSYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBL has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSYY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBL vs. TSYY - Dividend Comparison
FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, less than TSYY's 282.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF | 2.58% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 51.58% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 282.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBL and TSYY have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBL has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to TSYY (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs TSYY's -41.52%.
On 1-year performance, TSYY leads with -12.29% vs -29.78% for FBL. On fees, TSYY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSYY has performed better with a -12.29% return vs -29.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSYY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for FBL.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 282.79%, compared with 2.58% for FBL.
FBL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TSYY is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for FBL and 0.99% for TSYY.
TSYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.39 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBL and TSYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer