TSYY vs. TSLW
TSYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF) and TSLW (Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TSYY returned -9.90% vs -3.40% for TSLW. Their correlation of 0.90 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TSYY charges 1.15%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSLW.
Performance
TSYY vs. TSLW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TSYY achieves a -23.02% return, which is significantly higher than TSLW's -38.16% return.
TSYY
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -6.99%
- 6M
- -22.45%
- YTD
- -23.02%
- 1Y
- -9.90%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -25.20%
TSLW
- 1D
- 1.15%
- 1M
- -25.15%
- 6M
- -34.54%
- YTD
- -38.16%
- 1Y
- -3.40%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -14.25%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.02M | $1.80M | $2.69M | |
| $760.06K | $828.41K | $1.81M |
TSYY vs. TSLW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | -23.02% | 4.98% |
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | -38.16% | 35.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between TSYY and TSLW is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2025 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TSYY and TSLW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TSYY vs. TSLW — Risk / Return Rank
TSYY
TSLW
TSYY vs. TSLW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) and Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TSYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.03 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | -0.12 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.70 | -0.29 | -0.41 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TSYY vs. TSLW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TSYY drawdown since its inception was -42.66%, smaller than the maximum TSLW drawdown of -47.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TSYY and TSLW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TSYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.66% | -47.19% | +4.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.02% | -47.19% | +14.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.57% | -44.27% | +2.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.05% | -14.92% | -12.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.04% | 19.01% | -0.97% |
Volatility
TSYY vs. TSLW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF (TSYY) is 6.96%, while Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF (TSLW) has a volatility of 24.91%. This indicates that TSYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TSYY | TSLW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 24.91% | -17.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.02% | 41.72% | -24.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.54% | 55.54% | -26.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 58.84% | -22.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.41% | 58.84% | -22.43% |
TSYY vs. TSLW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TSYY has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TSYY vs. TSLW - Dividend Comparison
TSYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 256.16%, more than TSLW's 121.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TSLW Roundhill TSLA WeeklyPay™ ETF | 121.20% | 49.31% | 0.00% |
TSYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSLA ETF | 246.79% | 256.64% | 0.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, TSYY and TSLW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TSLW has higher volatility (24.91%) compared to TSYY (6.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TSYY dropped -42.66% vs TSLW's -47.19%.
On 1-year performance, TSLW leads with -3.40% vs -9.90% for TSYY. On fees, TSLW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, TSYY has been the lower-risk option at 6.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, TSLW has performed better with a -3.40% return vs -9.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TSLW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for TSYY.
TSYY has the higher dividend yield at 246.79%, compared with 121.20% for TSLW.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for TSYY and 0.99% for TSLW.
TSLW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.10 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TSYY and TSLW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer