FBL vs. AMZZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBL (GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF) and AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBL returned -29.78% vs 25.28% for AMZZ. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.15% expense ratio.

Performance

FBL vs. AMZZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBL achieves a -19.72% return, which is significantly lower than AMZZ's 9.44% return.

FBL

• 1D: 8.48%
• 1M: 2.55%
• YTD: -19.72%
• 6M: -15.34%
• 1Y: -29.78%
• 3Y*: 33.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMZZ

• 1D: -5.02%
• 1M: -16.12%
• YTD: 9.44%
• 6M: 7.26%
• 1Y: 25.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBL vs. AMZZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	-19.72%	0.50%	19.51%
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	9.44%	-8.94%	38.36%

Correlation

The correlation between FBL and AMZZ is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024	0.59

The correlation between FBL and AMZZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBL vs. AMZZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBL	AMZZ
Communication Services	66.7%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	66.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FBL vs. AMZZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBL

FBL Risk / Return Rank: 5
FBL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
FBL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Omega Ratio Rank: 6
FBL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FBL Martin Ratio Rank: 4

AMZZ

AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 17
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 19
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBL vs. AMZZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBL	AMZZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.42	0.43	-0.85
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.22	0.99	-1.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	1.12	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.49	0.61	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.91	1.37	-2.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBL vs. AMZZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBL Sharpe Ratio is -0.42, which is lower than the AMZZ Sharpe Ratio of 0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBL and AMZZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBL	AMZZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.42	0.43	-0.85
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.12	0.25	+0.87

Drawdowns

FBL vs. AMZZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBL drawdown since its inception was -61.15%, which is greater than AMZZ's maximum drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBL and AMZZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBL	AMZZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.15%	-55.28%	-5.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-61.03%	-41.97%	-19.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-61.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-47.97%	-18.02%	-29.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.41%	-20.21%	+3.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.76%	18.49%	+14.27%

Volatility

FBL vs. AMZZ - Volatility Comparison

GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF (FBL) has a higher volatility of 17.63% compared to GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) at 14.66%. This indicates that FBL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMZZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBL	AMZZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.63%	14.66%	+2.97%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.15%	40.44%	+12.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.42%	59.66%	+10.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.06%	62.82%	+8.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.06%	62.82%	+8.24%

FBL vs. AMZZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBL and AMZZ have an expense ratio of 1.15%.

Dividends

FBL vs. AMZZ - Dividend Comparison

FBL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.58%, while AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FBL GraniteShares 2x Long META Daily ETF	2.58%	2.07%	0.00%	51.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBL and AMZZ in my portfolio?

FBL and AMZZ have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBL or AMZZ?

FBL has higher volatility (17.63%) compared to AMZZ (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBL dropped -61.15% vs AMZZ's -55.28%.

Which ETF is better, FBL or AMZZ?

On 1-year performance, AMZZ leads with 25.28% vs -29.78% for FBL. Both ETFs have the same 1.15% expense ratio. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBL or AMZZ?

Over the 1-year period, AMZZ has performed better with a 25.28% return vs -29.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBL or AMZZ?

FBL and AMZZ have the same expense ratio: 1.15% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBL or AMZZ?

FBL has the higher dividend yield at 2.58%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AMZZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.43 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.