PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AMZZ vs. NVDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 17.35% return.


AMZZ

1D
-5.02%
1M
-16.12%
YTD
9.44%
6M
7.26%
1Y
25.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NVDX

1D
-7.03%
1M
14.15%
YTD
17.35%
6M
23.60%
1Y
75.17%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
9.44%-8.94%38.36%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
17.35%26.24%64.51%

Correlation

The correlation between AMZZ and NVDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024

0.44

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AMZZ
NVDX

Consumer Cyclical

66.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

100.0%

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

AMZZ
66.7%
NVDX

-

Basic Materials

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Communication Services

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Consumer Defensive

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Energy

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Financial Services

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Healthcare

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Industrials

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Real Estate

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Technology

AMZZ

-

NVDX
100.0%

Utilities

AMZZ

-

NVDX

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AMZZ vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMZZ
AMZZ Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AMZZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMZZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMZZ Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AMZZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMZZ Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDX
NVDX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
NVDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AMZZNVDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.43

1.11

-0.68

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.99

1.76

-0.77

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.21

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.61

1.73

-1.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.37

3.91

-2.54

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMZZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the NVDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMZZ and NVDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AMZZNVDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

1.11

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.44

-1.19

Drawdowns

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and NVDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AMZZNVDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.28%

-68.19%

+12.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.97%

-43.76%

+1.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.02%

-18.27%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-20.28%

+0.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.49%

19.27%

-0.78%

Volatility

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is 14.66%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that AMZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AMZZNVDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.66%

24.68%

-10.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.44%

50.88%

-10.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

59.66%

68.45%

-8.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

62.82%

95.58%

-32.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

62.82%

95.58%

-32.76%

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AMZZ vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison

AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024
AMZZ
GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDX
T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF
2.85%3.35%15.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


AMZZ and NVDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVDX has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to AMZZ (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZZ dropped -55.28% vs NVDX's -68.19%.

On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 75.17% vs 25.28% for AMZZ. On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 75.17% return vs 25.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMZZ.

NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMZZ and 1.05% for NVDX.

NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AMZZ and NVDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer