AMZZ vs. NVDX
AMZZ (GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF) and NVDX (T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AMZZ returned 25.28% vs 75.17% for NVDX. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AMZZ charges 1.15%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDX.
Performance
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AMZZ achieves a 9.44% return, which is significantly lower than NVDX's 17.35% return.
AMZZ
- 1D
- -5.02%
- 1M
- -16.12%
- YTD
- 9.44%
- 6M
- 7.26%
- 1Y
- 25.28%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDX
- 1D
- -7.03%
- 1M
- 14.15%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 23.60%
- 1Y
- 75.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | 9.44% | -8.94% | 38.36% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 17.35% | 26.24% | 64.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between AMZZ and NVDX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 19, 2024 | 0.44 |
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AMZZ
NVDX
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
AMZZ
NVDX
-
Basic Materials
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Communication Services
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Consumer Defensive
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Energy
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Financial Services
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Healthcare
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Industrials
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Real Estate
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Technology
AMZZ
-
NVDX
Utilities
AMZZ
-
NVDX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AMZZ vs. NVDX — Risk / Return Rank
AMZZ
NVDX
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) and T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AMZZ | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.43 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 1.76 | -0.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.73 | -1.12 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.37 | 3.91 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AMZZ | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 | 1.11 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 1.44 | -1.19 |
Drawdowns
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AMZZ drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum NVDX drawdown of -68.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMZZ and NVDX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AMZZ | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -68.19% | +12.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.97% | -43.76% | +1.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.02% | -18.27% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.21% | -20.28% | +0.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.49% | 19.27% | -0.78% |
Volatility
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF (AMZZ) is 14.66%, while T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF (NVDX) has a volatility of 24.68%. This indicates that AMZZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AMZZ | NVDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.66% | 24.68% | -10.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.44% | 50.88% | -10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.66% | 68.45% | -8.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 95.58% | -32.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.82% | 95.58% | -32.76% |
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AMZZ has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDX's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
AMZZ vs. NVDX - Dividend Comparison
AMZZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AMZZ GraniteShares 2x Long AMZN Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVDX T-REX 2X Long NVIDIA Daily Target ETF | 2.85% | 3.35% | 15.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AMZZ and NVDX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NVDX has higher volatility (24.68%) compared to AMZZ (14.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AMZZ dropped -55.28% vs NVDX's -68.19%.
On 1-year performance, NVDX leads with 75.17% vs 25.28% for AMZZ. On fees, NVDX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. On volatility, AMZZ has been the lower-risk option at 14.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NVDX has performed better with a 75.17% return vs 25.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NVDX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for AMZZ.
NVDX has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 0.00% for AMZZ.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and REX. Their fees differ too: 1.15% for AMZZ and 1.05% for NVDX.
NVDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AMZZ and NVDX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer