PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGX vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGX vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FBGX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPUU

1D
0.09%
1M
10.49%
YTD
21.37%
6M
21.39%
1Y
57.39%
3Y*
38.80%
5Y*
20.89%
10Y*
24.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%35.73%83.74%-56.41%57.04%65.79%75.84%-16.58%64.01%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
21.37%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGX and SPUU is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2014

0.81

The correlation between FBGX and SPUU shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (3 years) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FBGX vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FBGX
SPUU

Basic Materials

0.0%
0.7%

Communication Services

0.0%
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.0%
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%
2.0%

Energy

0.0%
1.4%

Financial Services

0.0%
4.8%

Healthcare

0.0%
3.6%

Industrials

0.0%
3.3%

Real Estate

0.0%
0.8%

Technology

0.0%
16.5%

Utilities

0.0%
1.1%

Basic Materials

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
0.7%

Communication Services

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
4.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
4.2%

Consumer Defensive

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
2.0%

Energy

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
1.4%

Financial Services

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
4.8%

Healthcare

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
3.6%

Industrials

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
3.3%

Real Estate

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
0.8%

Technology

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
16.5%

Utilities

FBGX
0.0%
SPUU
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGX vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGX

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBGX vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBGXSPUUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

Drawdowns

FBGX vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGXSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

Volatility

FBGX vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGXSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.77%

FBGX vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.64% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGX vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPUU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGX
UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares
1.32%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGX and SPUU have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

SPUU has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.

FBGX tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.64% for SPUU.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGX and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer