FBGX vs. OOQB

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB).

FBGX and OOQB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. OOQB is an actively managed fund by Volatility Shares. It was launched on Feb 18, 2025.

Performance

FBGX vs. OOQB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBGX vs. OOQB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	-27.42%	-13.30%

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OOQB

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: -6.25%
• YTD: -27.42%
• 6M: -46.56%
• 1Y: -16.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. OOQB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than OOQB's 0.75% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

OOQB

Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. OOQB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

OOQB

OOQB Risk / Return Rank: 8
OOQB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
OOQB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
OOQB Omega Ratio Rank: 9
OOQB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
OOQB Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. OOQB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF (OOQB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGX	OOQB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.55	—

Dividends

FBGX vs. OOQB - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OOQB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.65%.

	TTM	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
OOQB Volatility Shares One+One Nasdaq-100® and Bitcoin ETF	13.65%	9.53%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	OOQB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-53.44%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-49.90%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.05%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	24.19%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	OOQB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.65%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	46.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	59.59%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	61.88%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	61.88%	—