FBGX vs. LINT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and LINT (Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FBGX is passively managed, while LINT is actively managed. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for LINT.

Performance

FBGX vs. LINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LINT

• 1D: -12.86%
• 1M: 11.99%
• YTD: 744.89%
• 6M: 773.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. LINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	744.89%	5.81%

FBGX vs. LINT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBGX	LINT
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	0.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	0.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	0.0%	-
Energy	0.0%	-
Financial Services	0.0%	-
Healthcare	0.0%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Real Estate	0.0%	-
Technology	0.0%	100.0%
Utilities	0.0%	-

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. LINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares (LINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	LINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-12.86%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.48%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	LINT	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	168.83%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	168.83%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	168.83%	—

FBGX vs. LINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than LINT's 0.97% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGX vs. LINT - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LINT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.10%.

Position	TTM	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
LINT Direxion Daily INTC Bull 2X Shares	0.10%	0.25%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FBGX or LINT?

On fees, LINT is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBGX or LINT?

LINT is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBGX or LINT?

LINT has the higher dividend yield at 0.10%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.

What is the main difference between FBGX and LINT?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.97% for LINT.