FBGX vs. HOOG

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG).

FBGX and HOOG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBGX is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 11, 2014. HOOG is an actively managed fund by Leverage Shares. It was launched on Mar 20, 2025.

Performance

FBGX vs. HOOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBGX vs. HOOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	-68.81%	291.44%

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HOOG

• 1D: -3.42%
• 1M: -21.56%
• YTD: -68.81%
• 6M: -84.18%
• 1Y: 34.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. HOOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOG's 0.75% expense ratio.

FBGX

UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN

HOOG

Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. HOOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HOOG

HOOG Risk / Return Rank: 28
HOOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
HOOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
HOOG Omega Ratio Rank: 39
HOOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
HOOG Martin Ratio Rank: 16

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGX vs. HOOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF (HOOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGX	HOOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.15	—

Dividends

FBGX vs. HOOG - Dividend Comparison

FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HOOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.45%.

	TTM	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
HOOG Leverage Shares 2X Long HOOD Daily ETF	39.45%	12.30%

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	HOOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-86.94%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-86.94%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-85.45%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-30.39%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	41.72%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	HOOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	31.45%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	100.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	143.16%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	143.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	143.39%	—