FBGX vs. CIFG

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and CIFG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FBGX is passively managed, while CIFG is actively managed. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CIFG.

Performance

FBGX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CIFG

• 1D: -3.87%
• 1M: 42.24%
• YTD: 96.56%
• 6M: 67.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%	0.00%
CIFG Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF	96.56%	-32.52%

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	CIFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-71.71%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-10.44%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-35.54%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	CIFG	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	205.93%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	205.93%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	205.93%	—

FBGX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FBGX or CIFG?

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBGX or CIFG?

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBGX or CIFG?

FBGX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FBGX and CIFG?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.75% for CIFG.