FBCKX vs. HEQ
FBCKX (Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z) and HEQ (John Hancock Diversified Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, FBCKX returned 45.08% vs 22.88% for HEQ. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBCKX charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for HEQ.
Performance
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than HEQ's 12.47% return.
FBCKX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 9.11%
- YTD
- 18.59%
- 6M
- 19.80%
- 1Y
- 45.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEQ
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 2.69%
- YTD
- 12.47%
- 6M
- 13.49%
- 1Y
- 22.88%
- 3Y*
- 15.11%
- 5Y*
- 7.83%
- 10Y*
- 7.64%
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 18.59% | 19.99% | 7.26% |
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund | 12.47% | 15.64% | -4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCKX and HEQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024 | 0.54 |
The correlation between FBCKX and HEQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.54 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCKX vs. HEQ — Risk / Return Rank
FBCKX
HEQ
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBCKX | HEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.41 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.68 | 3.32 | +0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.61 | 13.88 | +1.74 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBCKX | HEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.67 | 2.19 | +0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 0.34 | +0.91 |
Drawdowns
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCKX drawdown since its inception was -27.06%, smaller than the maximum HEQ drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCKX and HEQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCKX | HEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.06% | -44.38% | +17.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.63% | -6.92% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.37% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -44.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.84% | +0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.04% | -8.57% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 1.65% | +1.32% |
Volatility
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to John Hancock Diversified Income Fund (HEQ) at 3.71%. This indicates that FBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCKX | HEQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.14% | 3.71% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.00% | 8.74% | +4.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 10.51% | +6.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 16.52% | +7.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.92% | 18.85% | +5.07% |
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCKX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than HEQ's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCKX vs. HEQ - Dividend Comparison
FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than HEQ's 8.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCKX Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z | 1.60% | 1.90% | 2.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HEQ John Hancock Diversified Income Fund | 8.46% | 9.30% | 9.79% | 10.75% | 10.09% | 8.92% | 11.64% | 10.09% | 11.50% | 10.44% | 9.57% | 10.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCKX and HEQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBCKX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to HEQ (3.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCKX dropped -27.06% vs HEQ's -44.38%.
FBCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCKX and HEQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer