FAT vs. CBRL
FAT (FAT Brands Inc.) and CBRL (Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Restaurants industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, FAT returned -49.21%/yr vs -23.54%/yr for CBRL. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAT vs. CBRL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAT achieves a -48.32% return, which is significantly lower than CBRL's 32.40% return.
FAT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -48.32%
- 6M
- -69.26%
- 1Y
- -92.84%
- 3Y*
- -62.32%
- 5Y*
- -49.21%
- 10Y*
- —
CBRL
- 1D
- -3.07%
- 1M
- 13.89%
- YTD
- 32.40%
- 6M
- 16.53%
- 1Y
- -39.65%
- 3Y*
- -28.59%
- 5Y*
- -23.54%
- 10Y*
- -11.52%
FAT vs. CBRL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | -48.32% | -89.39% | -3.66% | 32.64% | -50.03% | 86.50% | 30.77% | -1.21% | -44.62% | -21.20% |
CBRL Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. | 32.40% | -50.94% | -27.92% | -14.02% | -22.66% | -0.85% | -11.25% | -0.79% | 3.69% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAT and CBRL is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2017 | 0.11 |
Fundamentals
FAT:
$2.91M
CBRL:
$743.94M
FAT:
-$12.65
CBRL:
-$0.18
FAT:
0.01
CBRL:
0.22
FAT:
$574.14M
CBRL:
$3.36B
FAT:
$157.40M
CBRL:
$803.23M
FAT:
-$45.08M
CBRL:
$92.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAT vs. CBRL — Risk / Return Rank
FAT
CBRL
FAT vs. CBRL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) and Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAT | CBRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.55 | 0.90 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.99 | -0.61 | -0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.36 | -0.83 | -0.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAT | CBRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.96 | -0.72 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.75 | -0.51 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.41 | 0.24 | -0.65 |
Drawdowns
FAT vs. CBRL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAT drawdown since its inception was -97.48%, which is greater than CBRL's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAT and CBRL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAT | CBRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.48% | -82.98% | -14.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -94.21% | -64.96% | -29.25% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -96.59% | -71.91% | -24.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -97.48% | -81.27% | -16.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -82.98% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.48% | -77.12% | -20.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -24.17% | -25.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 67.51% | 47.66% | +19.85% |
Volatility
FAT vs. CBRL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAT Brands Inc. (FAT) is 0.00%, while Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. (CBRL) has a volatility of 14.68%. This indicates that FAT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBRL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAT | CBRL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 14.68% | -14.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 92.92% | 36.79% | +56.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.68% | 54.87% | +42.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.34% | 45.92% | +20.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 77.26% | 42.84% | +34.42% |
Dividends
FAT vs. CBRL - Dividend Comparison
FAT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBRL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CBRL Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. | 3.02% | 3.94% | 5.86% | 6.75% | 5.49% | 1.79% | 2.96% | 3.32% | 3.07% | 5.16% | 4.64% | 5.68% |
FAT FAT Brands Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 10.53% | 9.24% | 10.92% | 4.91% | 0.00% | 2.64% | 7.66% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
FAT vs. CBRL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FAT Brands Inc. and Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAT vs. CBRL - Profitability Comparison
FAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a gross profit of 37.49M and revenue of 140.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.8%.
CBRL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 874.82M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
FAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported an operating income of -17.34M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in an operating margin of -12.4%.
CBRL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. reported an operating income of 463.00K and revenue of 874.82M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.1%.
FAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, FAT Brands Inc. reported a net income of -58.22M and revenue of 140.01M, resulting in a net margin of -41.6%.
CBRL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. reported a net income of 1.28M and revenue of 874.82M, resulting in a net margin of 0.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAT and CBRL have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CBRL has higher volatility (14.68%) compared to FAT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAT dropped -97.48% vs CBRL's -82.98%.
CBRL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.72 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAT and CBRL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer