FAST vs. CLS.TO
FAST (Fastenal Company) and CLS.TO (Celestica Inc.) are both stocks. FAST operates in Industrial Distribution (Industrials), while CLS.TO operates in Electronic Components (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FAST returned 18.53%/yr vs 43.72%/yr for CLS.TO. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FAST is traded in USD, while CLS.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CLS.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 17.31% return, which is significantly lower than CLS.TO's 32.83% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has underperformed CLS.TO with an annualized return of 18.53%, while CLS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 43.72% annualized return.
FAST
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 7.65%
- YTD
- 17.31%
- 6M
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 12.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.88%
- 10Y*
- 18.53%
CLS.TO
- 1D
- 2.04%
- 1M
- 9.21%
- YTD
- 32.83%
- 6M
- 28.62%
- 1Y
- 214.47%
- 3Y*
- 207.66%
- 5Y*
- 116.16%
- 10Y*
- 43.72%
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 17.31% | 13.98% | 13.53% | 41.31% | -24.34% | 34.06% | 36.60% | 45.08% | -1.61% | 19.66% |
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 32.83% | 220.69% | 215.14% | 160.52% | 1.78% | 37.36% | -2.32% | -6.08% | -16.29% | -11.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAST and CLS.TO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.27 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAST and CLS.TO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.27, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FAST:
$53.60B
CLS.TO:
CA$63.66B
FAST:
$1.13
CLS.TO:
$8.28
FAST:
41.23
CLS.TO:
47.51
FAST:
4.84
CLS.TO:
0.64
FAST:
6.35
CLS.TO:
3.30
FAST:
13.43
CLS.TO:
21.70
FAST:
$8.44B
CLS.TO:
$13.81B
FAST:
$3.79B
CLS.TO:
$1.60B
FAST:
$1.80B
CLS.TO:
$1.36B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAST vs. CLS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
FAST
CLS.TO
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAST | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.38 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.50 | 6.89 | -6.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 17.07 | -16.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum CLS.TO drawdown of -80.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and CLS.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAST | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.43% | -80.63% | +17.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -29.56% | +7.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.90% | -53.42% | +31.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.71% | -53.42% | +22.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.71% | -80.63% | +49.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.09% | -16.52% | +10.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.16% | -26.16% | +14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 11.91% | -0.94% |
Volatility
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 6.20%, while Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a volatility of 28.03%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CLS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAST | CLS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.20% | 28.03% | -21.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.27% | 55.40% | -36.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.90% | 72.00% | -47.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 56.84% | -32.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.77% | 49.39% | -22.62% |
Dividends
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Dividend Comparison
FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.98%, while CLS.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS.TO Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAST Fastenal Company | 1.98% | 2.18% | 2.17% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% |
Financials
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Celestica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FAST vs. CLS.TO - Profitability Comparison
FAST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 982.90M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.
CLS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.
FAST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 447.60M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.
CLS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.
FAST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 339.80M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.
CLS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FAST and CLS.TO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FAST and CLS.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer