FAST vs. EMR

In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 29.17% return, which is significantly lower than EMR's 35.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed EMR with an annualized return of 16.87%, while EMR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.06% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Emerson Electric Co. (EMR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FAST Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the EMR Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAST and EMR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than EMR's 1.63% yield.

The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than EMR's maximum drawdown of -56.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and EMR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 7.62%, while Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) has a volatility of 10.49%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Emerson Electric Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.