FASOX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
FASOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 3.45% | 8.28% | -2.00% | 20.51% | -7.38% | 33.31% | 8.21% | 34.49% | -16.90% | 17.40% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 5.14% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASOX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 5.14% return. Over the past 10 years, FASOX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.92% annualized return.
FASOX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
HWMIX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -3.40%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 20.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASOX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASOX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FASOX
HWMIX
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASOX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.36 | +0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.20 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 1.11 | +0.18 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 4.53 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASOX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.88 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.43 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.35 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.47 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASOX and HWMIX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
FASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, more than HWMIX's 1.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 8.73% | 9.03% | 0.00% | 2.74% | 2.34% | 7.97% | 0.91% | 5.21% | 15.65% | 7.00% | 20.89% | 1.24% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.32% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASOX drawdown since its inception was -69.86%, roughly equal to the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASOX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASOX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.86% | -69.84% | -0.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -16.87% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.34% | -25.90% | -8.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.97% | -63.21% | +15.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.79% | -4.77% | -5.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -10.89% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 4.14% | -0.39% |
Volatility
FASOX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 3.97%. This indicates that FASOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASOX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 3.97% | +1.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 12.35% | +0.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 23.86% | -1.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 22.33% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 25.61% | -3.66% |