PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWMIX vs. DCINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly lower than DCINX's 24.97% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed DCINX with an annualized return of 9.73%, while DCINX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.72% annualized return.


HWMIX

1D
1.53%
1M
1.16%
YTD
15.24%
6M
17.53%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
15.24%
5Y*
9.76%
10Y*
9.73%

DCINX

1D
1.16%
1M
7.70%
YTD
24.97%
6M
28.99%
1Y
52.92%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
12.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
15.24%7.87%3.62%19.87%1.63%39.18%0.49%12.97%-19.32%7.69%
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
24.97%46.37%7.65%15.98%-14.67%9.70%19.86%18.14%-14.27%24.40%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and DCINX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2004

0.68

Over the past year, the correlation between HWMIX and DCINX has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. DCINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HWMIX
HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DCINX
DCINX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
DCINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DCINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DCINX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
DCINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
DCINX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HWMIXDCINXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.12

3.44

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.01

4.38

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.61

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.67

4.52

+0.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.14

18.19

-5.05

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is lower than the DCINX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and DCINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HWMIXDCINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.12

3.44

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.90

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.77

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.35

+0.14

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, which is greater than DCINX's maximum drawdown of -61.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and DCINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMIXDCINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.84%

-61.79%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-11.91%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.90%

-13.74%

-12.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-31.18%

+5.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-37.28%

-25.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.83%

-12.85%

+2.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

2.96%

-0.42%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 3.49%, while Dunham International Stock Fund (DCINX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DCINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMIXDCINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

5.54%

-2.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

13.44%

-2.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.28%

15.89%

+0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.19%

15.39%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.56%

16.53%

+9.03%

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DCINX's 2.92% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWMIX vs. DCINX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, less than DCINX's 8.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DCINX
Dunham International Stock Fund
8.76%10.95%13.87%3.45%3.53%15.49%1.36%1.54%6.92%3.92%0.00%0.00%
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
1.21%1.39%1.15%0.28%0.49%1.28%2.25%1.60%2.99%6.72%1.53%14.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWMIX and DCINX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DCINX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to HWMIX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs DCINX's -61.79%.

DCINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 2.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWMIX and DCINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer