PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HWMIX vs. HWCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HWMIX achieves a 21.22% return, which is significantly higher than HWCIX's 12.22% return. Over the past 10 years, HWMIX has underperformed HWCIX with an annualized return of 10.53%, while HWCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.02% annualized return.


HWMIX

1D
-1.17%
1M
6.73%
6M
15.52%
YTD
21.22%
1Y
35.99%
3Y*
12.62%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
10.53%
ALL TIME*
11.36%

HWCIX

1D
-0.94%
1M
3.76%
6M
10.42%
YTD
12.22%
1Y
27.56%
3Y*
15.61%
5Y*
12.35%
10Y*
13.02%
ALL TIME*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
21.22%7.87%3.62%19.87%1.63%39.18%0.49%12.97%-19.32%7.69%
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
12.22%17.09%12.80%19.01%-4.35%32.46%0.42%29.30%-14.74%18.37%

Correlation

The correlation between HWMIX and HWCIX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2004

0.94

The correlation between HWMIX and HWCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HWMIX vs. HWCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

HWMIX
HWMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HWMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
HWMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HWCIX
HWCIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
HWCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HWCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
HWCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HWCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
HWCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


HWMIXHWCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

3.86

+0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.76

12.03

+0.74

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HWMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the HWCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HWMIX and HWCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HWMIX drawdown since its inception was -69.84%, roughly equal to the maximum HWCIX drawdown of -69.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HWMIX and HWCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HWMIXHWCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.84%

-69.74%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.33%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.90%

-16.52%

-9.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.90%

-23.62%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.21%

-47.31%

-15.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.17%

-0.94%

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.78%

-12.27%

+1.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.04%

+0.48%

Volatility

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) is 3.85%, while Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund (HWCIX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that HWMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HWCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HWMIXHWCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

4.46%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.69%

9.45%

+1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

13.18%

+2.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.90%

17.99%

+3.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.32%

21.47%

+3.85%

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HWMIX has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than HWCIX's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

HWMIX vs. HWCIX - Dividend Comparison

HWMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%, less than HWCIX's 9.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HWCIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Diversified Value Fund
9.93%11.15%13.85%1.56%1.12%1.10%1.99%1.82%1.62%1.82%5.17%1.49%
HWMIX
Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund
1.15%1.39%1.15%0.28%0.49%1.28%2.25%1.60%2.99%6.72%1.53%14.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


HWMIX and HWCIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HWCIX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to HWMIX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HWMIX dropped -69.84% vs HWCIX's -69.74%.

HWMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HWMIX and HWCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer