PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASOX vs. ARFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASOX achieves a 24.07% return, which is significantly higher than ARFFX's 8.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FASOX has outperformed ARFFX with an annualized return of 11.41%, while ARFFX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.


FASOX

1D
1.24%
1M
4.44%
YTD
24.07%
6M
22.37%
1Y
41.69%
3Y*
14.40%
5Y*
10.21%
10Y*
11.41%

ARFFX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.37%
YTD
8.39%
6M
7.53%
1Y
33.38%
3Y*
15.74%
5Y*
8.40%
10Y*
10.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
24.07%8.28%-2.00%20.51%-7.38%33.31%8.21%34.49%-16.90%17.40%
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
8.39%21.00%13.39%6.98%-9.12%21.14%6.90%25.62%-13.23%15.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FASOX and ARFFX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2005

0.90

The correlation between FASOX and ARFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASOX vs. ARFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASOX
FASOX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

ARFFX
ARFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
ARFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ARFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASOXARFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.36

4.22

+0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.03

10.64

+5.39

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.46, which is comparable to the ARFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASOX and ARFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASOX drawdown since its inception was -69.86%, which is greater than ARFFX's maximum drawdown of -57.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASOX and ARFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASOXARFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.86%

-57.66%

-12.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-8.02%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.34%

-23.39%

-10.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.34%

-24.50%

-9.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.97%

-43.22%

-4.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-4.31%

+3.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.69%

-9.43%

-0.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.65%

3.18%

-0.53%

Volatility

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Ariel Focus Fund (ARFFX) at 4.18%. This indicates that FASOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASOXARFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.18%

+1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.30%

9.58%

+2.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.32%

13.71%

+3.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.70%

18.54%

+2.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.03%

19.88%

+2.15%

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASOX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than ARFFX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASOX vs. ARFFX - Dividend Comparison

FASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.28%, less than ARFFX's 11.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARFFX
Ariel Focus Fund
11.70%12.68%2.27%3.33%8.30%3.30%2.41%1.03%7.61%5.76%1.04%13.91%
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
7.28%9.03%0.00%2.74%2.34%7.97%0.91%5.21%15.65%7.00%20.89%1.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASOX and ARFFX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASOX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to ARFFX (4.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASOX dropped -69.86% vs ARFFX's -57.66%.

ARFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASOX and ARFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer