FASOX vs. NMAVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX).
FASOX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 3, 1995. NMAVX is managed by Nuance Investments. It was launched on Dec 31, 2013.
Performance
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 3.45% | 8.28% | -2.00% | 20.51% | -7.38% | 33.31% | 8.21% | 34.49% | -16.90% | 17.40% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 1.05% | 1.91% | 5.20% | 6.44% | -5.26% | 11.10% | 4.41% | 30.71% | -5.44% | 14.81% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASOX achieves a 3.45% return, which is significantly higher than NMAVX's 1.05% return. Over the past 10 years, FASOX has outperformed NMAVX with an annualized return of 9.77%, while NMAVX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.
FASOX
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -8.92%
- YTD
- 3.45%
- 6M
- 8.18%
- 1Y
- 21.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.32%
- 5Y*
- 6.93%
- 10Y*
- 9.77%
NMAVX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -8.71%
- YTD
- 1.05%
- 6M
- 3.78%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASOX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is lower than NMAVX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASOX vs. NMAVX — Risk / Return Rank
FASOX
NMAVX
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASOX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.10 | +0.40 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.29 | 0.70 | +0.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.24 | 2.21 | +3.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASOX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 | 0.68 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.22 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | 0.50 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.50 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASOX and NMAVX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Dividend Comparison
FASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.73%, more than NMAVX's 0.99% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASOX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I | 8.73% | 9.03% | 0.00% | 2.74% | 2.34% | 7.97% | 0.91% | 5.21% | 15.65% | 7.00% | 20.89% | 1.24% |
NMAVX Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund | 0.99% | 1.00% | 7.55% | 1.78% | 9.05% | 11.98% | 0.61% | 5.91% | 7.16% | 7.05% | 1.83% | 4.24% |
Drawdowns
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASOX drawdown since its inception was -69.86%, which is greater than NMAVX's maximum drawdown of -30.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASOX and NMAVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASOX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -69.86% | -30.93% | -38.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.25% | -9.80% | -5.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.34% | -18.40% | -15.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.97% | -30.93% | -17.04% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.79% | -8.71% | -1.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -3.77% | -5.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.75% | 3.11% | +0.64% |
Volatility
FASOX vs. NMAVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) has a higher volatility of 5.25% compared to Nuance Mid Cap Value Fund (NMAVX) at 3.57%. This indicates that FASOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASOX | NMAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 3.57% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.53% | 7.57% | +4.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.48% | 14.28% | +8.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.60% | 13.21% | +7.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.95% | 15.05% | +6.90% |