PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASOX vs. FSLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FASOX having a 29.02% return and FSLSX slightly higher at 29.05%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FASOX having a 11.73% annualized return and FSLSX not far ahead at 12.12%.


FASOX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.05%
6M
19.18%
YTD
29.02%
1Y
44.00%
3Y*
12.86%
5Y*
10.57%
10Y*
11.73%
ALL TIME*
9.48%

FSLSX

1D
-0.08%
1M
2.06%
6M
19.20%
YTD
29.05%
1Y
33.28%
3Y*
14.06%
5Y*
11.28%
10Y*
12.12%
ALL TIME*
10.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
29.02%8.28%-2.00%20.51%-7.38%33.31%8.21%34.49%-16.90%17.40%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
29.05%0.24%9.25%20.54%-7.37%33.32%8.24%34.54%-16.90%17.49%

Correlation

The correlation between FASOX and FSLSX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 1993

0.99

The correlation between FASOX and FSLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASOX vs. FSLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FASOX
FASOX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FASOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASOX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FASOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FSLSX
FSLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FSLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FSLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASOXFSLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.30

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.11

3.06

+1.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.86

10.30

+5.56

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASOX Sharpe Ratio is 2.38, which is higher than the FSLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASOX and FSLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASOX drawdown since its inception was -69.86%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLSX drawdown of -69.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASOX and FSLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASOXFSLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.86%

-69.87%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.79%

0.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.34%

-26.81%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.34%

-26.81%

-7.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.97%

-47.98%

+0.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-0.91%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.66%

-8.25%

-1.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.94%

-0.39%

Volatility

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I (FASOX) and Fidelity Value Strategies Fund (FSLSX) have volatilities of 3.26% and 3.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASOXFSLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.26%

3.24%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.74%

11.73%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.02%

18.79%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.58%

20.41%

+0.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.95%

21.87%

+0.08%

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASOX has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than FSLSX's 0.86% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASOX vs. FSLSX - Dividend Comparison

FASOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, while FSLSX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASOX
Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class I
7.00%9.03%0.00%2.74%2.34%7.97%0.91%5.21%15.65%7.00%20.89%1.24%
FSLSX
Fidelity Value Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%10.41%2.49%2.13%7.29%0.84%4.84%14.59%6.57%19.71%1.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FASOX and FSLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASOX has higher volatility (3.26%) compared to FSLSX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASOX dropped -69.86% vs FSLSX's -69.87%.

FASOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASOX and FSLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer