PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASGX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FASGX having a 11.93% return and WFSPX slightly lower at 11.69%. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 10.01%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


FASGX

1D
0.51%
1M
4.40%
YTD
11.93%
6M
12.90%
1Y
26.54%
3Y*
16.47%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
10.01%

WFSPX

1D
0.13%
1M
5.80%
YTD
11.69%
6M
11.72%
1Y
28.93%
3Y*
22.71%
5Y*
14.24%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
11.93%18.23%10.81%16.45%-16.83%13.98%17.19%22.81%-7.65%17.34%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
11.69%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FASGX and WFSPX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 1993

0.94

The correlation between FASGX and WFSPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASGX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASGX
FASGX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
FASGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FASGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FASGXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.46

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.39

3.35

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.98

15.65

-0.68

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASGX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FASGXWFSPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.61

2.52

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

0.85

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.87

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.13

+0.50

Drawdowns

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASGXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.35%

-58.21%

+10.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-8.90%

+0.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.80%

-18.74%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.54%

-24.51%

+0.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.20%

-33.74%

+6.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-12.77%

+6.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.90%

-0.11%

Volatility

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 3.30% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 2.82%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASGXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

2.82%

+0.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.39%

8.97%

-0.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.34%

11.85%

-1.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.27%

16.88%

-4.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.65%

18.02%

-5.37%

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASGX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than WFSPX's 1.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASGX
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund
6.55%7.33%4.60%1.72%6.69%2.73%2.20%5.19%6.31%2.75%0.20%5.58%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund
1.56%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FASGX and WFSPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FASGX has higher volatility (3.30%) compared to WFSPX (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASGX dropped -47.35% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

FASGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASGX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer