FASGX vs. WFSPX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX).
FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991. WFSPX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jul 30, 1993.
Performance
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | -7.06% | 17.83% | 24.94% | 26.25% | -18.14% | 28.63% | 18.43% | 31.45% | -4.83% | 21.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASGX achieves a -2.99% return, which is significantly higher than WFSPX's -7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FASGX has underperformed WFSPX with an annualized return of 8.70%, while WFSPX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.63% annualized return.
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
WFSPX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.68%
- YTD
- -7.06%
- 6M
- -4.63%
- 1Y
- 14.40%
- 3Y*
- 17.13%
- 5Y*
- 11.37%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASGX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASGX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank
FASGX
WFSPX
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASGX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.21 | 0.84 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.73 | 1.30 | +0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.06 | +0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.89 | 5.13 | +1.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASGX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.21 | 0.84 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | 0.76 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.13 | +0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASGX and WFSPX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison
FASGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than WFSPX's 1.58% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
WFSPX iShares S&P 500 Index Fund | 1.58% | 1.72% | 1.41% | 1.50% | 2.02% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 1.99% | 2.00% | 1.62% | 2.37% | 2.49% |
Drawdowns
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASGX drawdown since its inception was -47.35%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASGX and WFSPX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASGX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.35% | -58.21% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.07% | -12.11% | +3.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.54% | -24.51% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.20% | -33.74% | +6.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -8.90% | +0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.74% | -12.84% | +6.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.04% | 2.49% | -0.45% |
Volatility
FASGX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) has a higher volatility of 4.57% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund (WFSPX) at 4.24%. This indicates that FASGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASGX | WFSPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.57% | 4.24% | +0.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.78% | 9.08% | -1.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.82% | 18.06% | -5.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.14% | 16.84% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.56% | 17.98% | -5.42% |